Re: [PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-25 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 25/05/2013 06:14, James Bottomley ha scritto: On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 24/05/2013 10:03, James Bottomley ha scritto: Does anyone in the real world actually care about this bug? Yes, or I would move on and not waste so much time on this. Fine, so produce

Re: [PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-24 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:58 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Adjust the blk_verify_command function to let it look at per-queue data. This will be done in the next patch. This is not a bug fix. This is an enabler for your complex and to my mind dubious rework of the SG_IO command filter. I'm

Re: [PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 24/05/2013 09:36, James Bottomley ha scritto: On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:58 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Adjust the blk_verify_command function to let it look at per-queue data. This will be done in the next patch. This is not a bug fix. This is an enabler for your complex and to my mind

Re: [PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-24 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 09:43 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 24/05/2013 09:36, James Bottomley ha scritto: On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:58 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Adjust the blk_verify_command function to let it look at per-queue data. This will be done in the next patch. This is not a

Re: [PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 24/05/2013 09:50, James Bottomley ha scritto: On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 09:43 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 24/05/2013 09:36, James Bottomley ha scritto: On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:58 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Adjust the blk_verify_command function to let it look at per-queue data. This will

Re: [PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-24 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 09:53 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 24/05/2013 09:50, James Bottomley ha scritto: On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 09:43 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 24/05/2013 09:36, James Bottomley ha scritto: On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 15:58 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Adjust the

Re: [PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 24/05/2013 10:03, James Bottomley ha scritto: Does anyone in the real world actually care about this bug? Yes, or I would move on and not waste so much time on this. Fine, so produce a simple fix for this bug which we can discuss that's not tied to this feature.

Re: [PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 24/05/2013 10:32, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: Il 24/05/2013 10:03, James Bottomley ha scritto: Does anyone in the real world actually care about this bug? Yes, or I would move on and not waste so much time on this. Fine, so produce a simple fix for this bug which we can discuss that's not

Re: [PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-24 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 10:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 24/05/2013 10:03, James Bottomley ha scritto: Does anyone in the real world actually care about this bug? Yes, or I would move on and not waste so much time on this. Fine, so produce a simple fix for this bug which we

[PATCH v3 part1 1/4] sg_io: pass request_queue to blk_verify_command

2013-05-23 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Adjust the blk_verify_command function to let it look at per-queue data. This will be done in the next patch. Acked-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org Cc: sta...@gnu.org Cc: FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomon...@lab.ntt.co.jp Cc: Doug Gilbert dgilb...@interlog.com Cc: James E.J. Bottomley