On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:21:15AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
My thought is that, the 2 functions are for ATAPI and can be used by
libata-eh, libata-zpodd and maybe others in the future, so it deserves
a separate place. But if this is regarded as unnecessary, I will drop
this patch.
Yeah, please
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 08:49:24PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:57:10AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:57PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
The atapi_eh_tur and atapi_eh_request_sense can be reused by ZPODD
code, so separate them out to a file named
On 11/18/2012 11:01 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 08:49:24PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:57:10AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:57PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
The atapi_eh_tur and atapi_eh_request_sense can be reused by ZPODD
code, so
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:57:10AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:57PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
The atapi_eh_tur and atapi_eh_request_sense can be reused by ZPODD
code, so separate them out to a file named libata-atapi.c, and the
Makefile is modified accordingly. No
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:51:57PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
The atapi_eh_tur and atapi_eh_request_sense can be reused by ZPODD
code, so separate them out to a file named libata-atapi.c, and the
Makefile is modified accordingly. No functional changes should result
from this commit.
Why is this
The atapi_eh_tur and atapi_eh_request_sense can be reused by ZPODD
code, so separate them out to a file named libata-atapi.c, and the
Makefile is modified accordingly. No functional changes should result
from this commit.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu aaron...@intel.com
---
drivers/ata/Makefile
6 matches
Mail list logo
