Re: [PATCHv2] st: remove st_mutex

2012-09-24 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:36 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
 From: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.com
 
 The st_mutex was created when the BKL was removed, and
 prevents simultaneous st_open calls. It is better to
 protect just the necessary data.
 
 Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.com
 Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan ldun...@suse.com

That should be Signed-off-by since you sent the patch to me.  Signoffs
have to follow the chain of transmission.  I've assumed this was just a
mistype.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCHv2] st: remove st_mutex

2012-09-24 Thread Lee Duncan
On 09/24/2012 02:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
 On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:36 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
 From: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.com

 The st_mutex was created when the BKL was removed, and
 prevents simultaneous st_open calls. It is better to
 protect just the necessary data.

 Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.com
 Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan ldun...@suse.com
 
 That should be Signed-off-by since you sent the patch to me.  Signoffs
 have to follow the chain of transmission.  I've assumed this was just a
 mistype.
 
 James

Thank you James.

-- 
Lee Duncan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCHv2] st: remove st_mutex

2012-09-10 Thread Lee Duncan
From: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.com

The st_mutex was created when the BKL was removed, and
prevents simultaneous st_open calls. It is better to
protect just the necessary data.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke h...@suse.com
Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan ldun...@suse.com

This patch is based on the misc branch of the SCSI tree
and the 5-patch series for st sent by Jeff Mahoney 8/18/2012
and Ack-ed by Kai on 8/20.

Changes in v2: patch meta-data corrected
---
 drivers/scsi/st.c | 8 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/st.c b/drivers/scsi/st.c
index ceca095..98156a9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/st.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/st.c
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static const char *verstr = 20101219;
 #include st_options.h
 #include st.h
 
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(st_mutex);
 static int buffer_kbs;
 static int max_sg_segs;
 static int try_direct_io = TRY_DIRECT_IO;
@@ -1185,7 +1184,6 @@ static int st_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
int dev = TAPE_NR(inode);
char *name;
 
-   mutex_lock(st_mutex);
/*
 * We really want to do nonseekable_open(inode, filp); here, but some
 * versions of tar incorrectly call lseek on tapes and bail out if that
@@ -1194,7 +1192,6 @@ static int st_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
filp-f_mode = ~(FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE);
 
if (!(STp = scsi_tape_get(dev))) {
-   mutex_unlock(st_mutex);
return -ENXIO;
}
 
@@ -1205,7 +1202,6 @@ static int st_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
if (STp-in_use) {
spin_unlock(st_use_lock);
scsi_tape_put(STp);
-   mutex_unlock(st_mutex);
DEB( printk(ST_DEB_MSG %s: Device already in use.\n, name); )
return (-EBUSY);
}
@@ -1259,16 +1255,16 @@ static int st_open(struct inode *inode, struct file 
*filp)
retval = (-EIO);
goto err_out;
}
-   mutex_unlock(st_mutex);
return 0;
 
  err_out:
normalize_buffer(STp-buffer);
+   spin_lock(st_use_lock);
STp-in_use = 0;
+   spin_unlock(st_use_lock);
scsi_tape_put(STp);
if (resumed)
scsi_autopm_put_device(STp-device);
-   mutex_unlock(st_mutex);
return retval;
 
 }
-- 
1.7.11.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-scsi in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html