nab == Nicholas A Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org writes:
nab Mmm, at least for PI I don't think a residual field is necessary.
nab Any time the metadata is not fully read on outgoing WRITEs, or
nab written on incoming READs the next hop performing a VERIFY
nab operation will end up failing with
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 11:23 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 24/02/2014 06:32, Nicholas A. Bellinger ha scritto:
AFAICT up until this point the -prio field has been unused, but
I'm certainly open to better ways of signaling (to vhost) that some
number of metadata iovs are to be expected..
From: Nicholas Bellinger n...@linux-iscsi.org
Hi MST, MKP, Paolo Co,
The following is an initial RFC series for allowing vhost/scsi to
accept T10 protection information (PI) as seperate SGLs along side
existing data payload SGLs from within virtio-scsi guest memory.
In it's current form, both
3 matches
Mail list logo
