Re: [SCSI] sd: Ensure we correctly disable devices with unknown protection type

2013-02-07 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Dan == Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com writes: Dan This patch wasn't applied. Nope, but it hasn't been forgotten. I have it in my resubmit queue with a couple of other stable fixes. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [SCSI] sd: Ensure we correctly disable devices with unknown protection type

2013-02-06 Thread Dan Carpenter
This patch wasn't applied. Probably because it didn't have [PATCH] in the email subject. regards, dan carpenter On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:39:44PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: Dan == Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com writes: Dan, Dan warn: buffer overflow 'cap' 4 = 4 Argh,

Re: [SCSI] sd: Ensure we correctly disable devices with unknown protection type

2012-09-26 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Dan == Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com writes: Dan, Dan warn: buffer overflow 'cap' 4 = 4 Argh, yes. Type 3 is 4 because it's a bitmask. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering SCSI: Fix range check in scsi_host.h The range checking from fe542396 was bad. We would