Re: [Scst-devel] [SPF:fail] Re: FC initiator performance tanks once target mode is enabled

2013-12-26 Thread Dr. Greg Wettstein
On Dec 23, 12:20pm, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: } Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] [SPF:fail] Re: FC initiator performance tanks on Hi, hope the week is going well for everyone. At the risk of wading into this controversy any further I thought it might be helpful to clarify some issues given the

Re: [Scst-devel] [SPF:fail] Re: FC initiator performance tanks once target mode is enabled

2013-12-23 Thread Steve Magnani
Nicholas, On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 10:51 -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote: On Dec 12, 11:45am, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: What I would prefer myself is to have a single set of target drivers that works for both LIO and SCST. That would not only make both projects easier to maintain but

Re: [Scst-devel] [SPF:fail] Re: FC initiator performance tanks once target mode is enabled

2013-12-23 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 09:13 -0600, Steve Magnani wrote: Nicholas, On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 10:51 -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote: On Dec 12, 11:45am, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: SNIP We don't add interfaces into mainline drive code to support out-of-tree projects, because quite