Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable

2016-10-25 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 10/24/2016 10:18 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 10/14/2016 10:21 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>> "Steffen" == Steffen Maier writes: >> >> Steffen> could you please queue this as fix for one of my patches that >> Steffen> went into the 4.9 merge window, so for 4.9-rc I guess? >> >>

Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable

2016-10-24 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 10/14/2016 10:21 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >> "Steffen" == Steffen Maier writes: > > Steffen> could you please queue this as fix for one of my patches that > Steffen> went into the 4.9 merge window, so for 4.9-rc I guess? > > Applied to 4.9/scsi-fixes. > FWIW, I do see rcu stall err

Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable

2016-10-14 Thread Martin K. Petersen
> "Steffen" == Steffen Maier writes: Steffen> could you please queue this as fix for one of my patches that Steffen> went into the 4.9 merge window, so for 4.9-rc I guess? Applied to 4.9/scsi-fixes. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable

2016-10-13 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:49:18PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > Dan, many thanks for catching this! Sparse did not notice, is there > other tooling that would find such things? This was a Smatch warning. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s

Re: [patch] zfcp: spin_lock_irqsave() is not nestable

2016-10-13 Thread Steffen Maier
Dan, many thanks for catching this! Sparse did not notice, is there other tooling that would find such things? James, Martin, could you please queue this as fix for one of my patches that went into the 4.9 merge window, so for 4.9-rc I guess? https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161013085358.GH16198@mw