note that if adaptec simply opensourced their managment tools we
wouldn't
have this problem at all. I wonder why Adaptec did that for the old
i2o-based controllers but not aacraid.
Oh yes, that, worked hard on the powers-that-be to permit this. Could
not release a substantial majority
Christoph Hellwig said:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:32:04PM -, Ross Macintyre wrote:
Since you advise us to stay away from Adaptec, and I assume you are part
of the team that manages the Fedora system,
I'm not associated with Fedora at all.
can you advise users what RAID
/ Storage
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:32:04PM -, Ross Macintyre wrote:
Since you advise us to stay away from Adaptec, and I assume you are part
of the team that manages the Fedora system,
I'm not associated with Fedora at all.
can you advise users what RAID
/ Storage vendors to use? ie what quality
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:43:50PM -0500, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
No, this shows that you have no interest in supporting legacy
applications
legacy of Adaptec's non linux-supporting past.
note that if adaptec simply opensourced their managment tools we wouldn't
have this problem at all. I wonder
Now you've gone and done it Christoph! ;-}
Christoph Hellwig writes:
legacy of Adaptec's non linux-supporting past.
Cry with me for a moment... We all know that certification is the real
issue here, most Penguins scoff at this requirement, but customers
expect it none-the-less and pull us
Hello,
Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
[...]
note that if adaptec simply opensourced their managment tools we wouldn't
have this problem at all. I wonder why Adaptec did that for the old
i2o-based controllers but not aacraid.
Oh yes, that, worked hard on the powers-that-be to permit this. Could
not
Hello,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
[...]
can you advise users what RAID
/ Storage vendors to use? ie what quality vendors support Linux?
LSI and 3ware for example do provide frequent driver updates, working
managment tools and cooperate with the linux community very well.
Hmmm, can't say something
Christoph Hellwig said:
We're not going to add new procfs handler for scsi HBA drivers.
And that was the answer to the question, thanks for answering it. Isn't
it nice to ask for guidance and get such direct answers?
Christoph Hellwig then goes on a tirade:
Unfortunately this problems shows
: adaptec 2120S software under RedHat 8.0 and FC2
Could someone possibly help?
I have upgraded a machine from RedHat 8.0 to FC2 and the
adaptec-browser1 and adaptec-smbe software that I installed is not
working
properly. It looks ok at first glance but if I pull a disk out I only
get
: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:53 PM
To: Salyzyn, Mark; Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Ross Macintyre; linux-scsi
Subject: RE: adaptec 2120S software under RedHat 8.0 and FC2
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 08:02 -0500, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
The applications require the Adaptec Branch of the driver in order to
function
Could someone possibly help?
I have upgraded a machine from RedHat 8.0 to FC2 and the
adaptec-browser1 and adaptec-smbe software that I installed is not working
properly. It looks ok at first glance but if I pull a disk out I only get
informed of the 'informational' type messages.
(Also the
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Macintyre
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:20 AM
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: adaptec 2120S software under RedHat 8.0 and FC2
Could someone possibly help?
I have upgraded a machine from RedHat 8.0 to FC2 and the
adaptec-browser1 and adaptec-smbe
12 matches
Mail list logo
