s390 error: implicit declaration of function sg_dma_len

2007-05-25 Thread Olaf Hering
Current Linus tree does not compile on s390 because esp_scsi references unavailable functions. /dev/shm/R/linux-2.6.21/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c: In function `esp_map_dma': /dev/shm/R/linux-2.6.21/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c:338: error: implicit declaration of function `sg_dma_len' /dev/shm/R/linux-2.

Re: s390 error: implicit declaration of function sg_dma_len

2007-05-25 Thread David Miller
From: Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:22:38 +0200 > Current Linus tree does not compile on s390 because esp_scsi references > unavailable functions. I have a fix for this pending in my sparc-2.6 tree which I'll send to Linus tomorrow, thanks for the report. - To unsubscr

[PATCH] s390 error: implicit declaration of function sg_dma_len

2007-05-25 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Olaf Hering wrote: > Current Linus tree does not compile on s390 because esp_scsi references > unavailable functions. > > /dev/shm/R/linux-2.6.21/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c: In function `esp_map_dma': > /dev/shm/R/linux-2.6.21/drivers/scsi/esp_scsi.c:338: error: implicit > declaration of function `s

Re: [PATCH] s390 error: implicit declaration of function sg_dma_len

2007-05-25 Thread David Miller
From: Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:08:08 +0200 > James, please apply. ESP cards simply don't fit in a mainframe :-) No James, please don't, I have a patch in my sparc-2.6 queue which will fix this already, and in a different way. - To unsubscribe from this list: s

Re: [PATCH] s390 error: implicit declaration of function sg_dma_len

2007-05-25 Thread David Miller
From: Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:08:08 +0200 > - depends on SCSI > + depends on SCSI && !S390 And for the record, the correct test would be HAS_DMA not !S390. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a me

Re: [patch 14/25] SCSI: use irq_handler_t where appropriate

2007-05-25 Thread Stefan Richter
Jeff Garzik wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: >> SCSI is a slightly different subsystem from almost any other in the >> kernel. It has something like 15 active driver maintainers plus at >> least another 15-25 periodically active ones. Most (but not all) driver >> maintainers are employed by the co

Re: [patch 14/25] SCSI: use irq_handler_t where appropriate

2007-05-25 Thread Stefan Richter
Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:04:06 -0500 James Bottomley wrote: >> maintainers are not always watching everything ... it would be nice if >> they were, but to give a patch the best shot at review, you try to >> attract their attention. Specifically, in this case, you should cc the

Re: [PATCH] s390 error: implicit declaration of function sg_dma_len

2007-05-25 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 02:13 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 11:08:08 +0200 > > > James, please apply. ESP cards simply don't fit in a mainframe :-) > > No James, please don't, I have a patch in my sparc-2.6 queue which > will fix thi

Re: [Stgt-devel] Question for pass-through target design

2007-05-25 Thread Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Robert Jennings wrote: * Vladislav Bolkhovitin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Robert Jennings wrote: What I meant that is that the kernel tgt code (scsi_tgt*) receives SCSI commands from one lld and send them to another lld instead of sending them to user space. Although the approach of passing

RE: [patch 1/1] scsi: cover up bugs^W^W^WFix up compiler warnings in megaraid driver

2007-05-25 Thread Patro, Sumant
Ack. --Sumant -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [patch 1/1] scsi: cover up bugs^W^W^

Re: [PATCH] s390 error: implicit declaration of function sg_dma_len

2007-05-25 Thread David Miller
From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 08:47:38 -0500 > OK, I won't ... but we're growing users of this base driver now, like > this one: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=352e921f0dd42f79652cdb50dd91122d068d7209 > > Could y

Re: [patch 1/1] scsi: cover up bugs^W^W^WFix up compiler warnings in megaraid driver

2007-05-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 25 May 2007 14:28:19 -0600 "Patro, Sumant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ack. Thanks. While we're here... box:/usr/src/25> grep -i lsi MAINTAINERS LSILOGIC MPT FUSION DRIVERS (FC/SAS/SPI) M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] L: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.l