Quoting Kohei KaiGai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Kohei KaiGai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> All that being said, the friendliness factor of this is somewhat
> undeniable, and so I can see why folk might want it in the kernel
> anyway. If so, would it possible to mo
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Kohei KaiGai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
All that being said, the friendliness factor of this is somewhat
undeniable, and so I can see why folk might want it in the kernel
anyway. If so, would it possible to move this code into
security/capability.c and not in the main ke
Quoting Kohei KaiGai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >> All that being said, the friendliness factor of this is somewhat
> >> undeniable, and so I can see why folk might want it in the kernel
> >> anyway. If so, would it possible to move this code into
> >> security/capability.c and not in the main kernel p
>> All that being said, the friendliness factor of this is somewhat
>> undeniable, and so I can see why folk might want it in the kernel
>> anyway. If so, would it possible to move this code into
>> security/capability.c and not in the main kernel per-se - protected with
>> a configuration option?
