On Sunday 11 November 2007 5:31:44 pm James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Add additional Flask definitions to support the new "peer" object class.
>
> Should this be dependent on dynamic class/permission support?
I think it's okay to _define_ the Flask definitions regar
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Paul Moore wrote:
> Add additional Flask definitions to support the new "peer" object class.
Should this be dependent on dynamic class/permission support?
Or, will these checks only be invoked if labled networking is configured?
--
James Morris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To uns
Add additional Flask definitions to support the new "peer" object class.
---
security/selinux/include/av_perm_to_string.h |3 +++
security/selinux/include/av_permissions.h|3 +++
security/selinux/include/class_to_string.h |7 +++
security/selinux/include/flask.h
