On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:30 PM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:15:15AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > +Ard
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:38 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:55:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:15:15AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> +Ard
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:38 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:55:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:33 PM Florian Fainelli
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
+Ard
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:38 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:55:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:33 PM Florian Fainelli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > While investigating why ARM64 required a ton of objects to be rebuilt
> > >
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:37:16AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:31:57PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > This series speeds up mremap(2) syscall by copying page tables at the
> > PMD level even for non-THP systems. There is concern that the extra
> > 'address'
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:38:34AM +0100, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:55:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:33 PM Florian Fainelli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > While investigating why ARM64 required a ton of objects to be rebuilt
> >
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 07:09:07PM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 03:57:24PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:57:33PM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 12,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:55:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:33 PM Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While investigating why ARM64 required a ton of objects to be rebuilt
> > when toggling CONFIG_DEV_BLK_INITRD, it became clear that this was
> > because