Hi Steven,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:41:09AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> At Linux Plumbers, Andy Lutomirski approached me and pointed out that the
> function call syscall_get_arguments() implemented in x86 was horribly
> written and not optimized for the
On 4/1/19 11:43 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> Tweak generic node topology in case of CONFIG_HIGHMEM enabled to
> prioritize allocations from ZONE_HIGHMEM to avoid ZONE_NORMAL
> pressure.
Can you explain the "pressure" part a bit more concretely - as in when did you
saw
crashes, oom, yadi yada
To propagate a fix for gcc bug 88409 [1] in ARC specific code
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89877
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta
---
ChangeLog | 4
stdlib/longlong.h | 6 --
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
On 4/3/19 2:53 AM, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote:
> Pushed, thank you for your contribution,
> Claudiu
Thx, can this be backported to gcc-8-stable please which is what glibc folks use
for testing !
-Vineet
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:27 PM Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
>> simple test such as below was
On 4/3/19 9:34 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>> -reg = <0x8000 0x4000>; /* 1 GiB */
>> +reg = <0x0 0x8000 0x0 0x4000>; /* 1 GB lowmem */
>> +/* 0x1 0x 0x0 0x4000>; 1 GB highmem */
> Could you please get rid of comment with
Hi Vineet,
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 12:18 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> 1. Bump top level address-cells/size-cells nodes to 2 (to ensure all
>down stream addresses are 64-bits, unless explicitly specified
>otherwise (in "soc" bus with all peripherals)
>
> 2. "memory" also specified with
walk_page_range() is going to be allowed to walk page tables other than
those of user space. For this it needs to know when it has reached a
'leaf' entry in the page tables. This information will be provided by the
p?d_large() functions/macros.
For arc, we only have two levels, so only
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:55:25PM +0300, Andrey Abramov wrote:
> Removes size argument from the swap function because:
> 1) It wasn't used.
> 2) Custom swap function knows what kind of objects it swaps,
> so it already knows their sizes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey
Pushed, thank you for your contribution,
Claudiu
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:27 PM Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
> simple test such as below was failing.
>
> | void main(int argc, char *argv[])
> | {
> |size_t total_time = 115424; // expected 115.424
> |double secs =
