Re: [PATCH] ARC: fpu: preserve userspace fpu state

On 1/17/20 4:49 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta > --- > arch/arc/Kconfig | 15 +++-- > arch/arc/include/asm/arcregs.h | 2 ++ > arch/arc/include/asm/fpu.h | 54 > arch/arc/include/asm/processor.h | 10 +- >

[PATCH 0/2] ARCv2 FPU registers save/restore

Vineet Gupta (2): ARC: fpu: declutter code, move bits out into fpu.h ARCv2: fpu: preserve userspace fpu state arch/arc/Kconfig | 15 +++-- arch/arc/include/asm/arcregs.h | 2 ++ arch/arc/include/asm/fpu.h | 55

[PATCH] ARC: fpu: preserve userspace fpu state

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta --- arch/arc/Kconfig | 15 +++-- arch/arc/include/asm/arcregs.h | 2 ++ arch/arc/include/asm/fpu.h | 54 arch/arc/include/asm/processor.h | 10 +- arch/arc/include/asm/switch_to.h | 17 ++

Re: ARCv2 Public PRM (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors)

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Vineet Gupta wrote: > The public PRM is now available and I would like you to try and access > it so that any bureaucracy is out of the way before I re-post ARC port > for 2.32 ! Thanks! There was one technical point regarding the glibc port I raised briefly in a

ARCv2 Public PRM (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors)

Hi Joseph, On 1/30/19 10:15 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 1/29/19 6:29 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >> In the absence of clear consensus regarding consideration of new ports to >> undocumented architectures (which would need to result in consensus on >> suitable rules on the subject to go in >>