On 8/29/19 8:05 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> No. This is a different one. Notice that the subject lines differ by one
> letter.
Umm, indeed I thought I'd already merged it.
Now added, will show up in linux-next after rc7
-Vineet
___
linux-snps-arc
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: unwind: Mark expected switch fall-through
>
> Hi,
>
> Friendly ping:
>
> Who can take this, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 8/20/19 8:29 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
: Thursday, August 29, 2019 04:47
To: Vineet Gupta
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: unwind: Mark expected switch fall-through
Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 8/20/19 8:29 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote
Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 8/20/19 8:29 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: haps_hs_defconfig arc):
>
> arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c: In function
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: haps_hs_defconfig arc):
arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c: In function ‘read_pointer’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:328:5: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
do {
