On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 03:16:18PM +, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On Mon, 2017-05-01 at 11:21 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:37:46PM +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > > In the current implementation dma_get_slave_caps is used to check
> > > state of descript
Hi Vinod,
On Mon, 2017-05-01 at 11:21 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:37:46PM +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > In the current implementation dma_get_slave_caps is used to check
> > state of descriptor_reuse option. But dma_get_slave_caps includes
> > check if the channel sup
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:37:46PM +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> In the current implementation dma_get_slave_caps is used to check
> state of descriptor_reuse option. But dma_get_slave_caps includes
> check if the channel supports slave transactions.
> So DMA_CTRL_REUSE flag can be set (even for
In the current implementation dma_get_slave_caps is used to check
state of descriptor_reuse option. But dma_get_slave_caps includes
check if the channel supports slave transactions.
So DMA_CTRL_REUSE flag can be set (even for MEM-TO-MEM tranfers)
only if channel supports slave transactions.
Now we