Re: ARCv2 Public PRM (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors)

2020-02-06 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 2/6/20 2:06 PM, Alistair Francis wrote: >> >> I'd suggest posting patches that are on top of the RV32 ones (maybe >> there's a git tree with RV32 changes to current glibc that could be used), >> and that only support Linux 5.1 and later (so you don't need anything much >> of the Y2038 support

Re: ARCv2 Public PRM (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors)

2020-02-06 Thread Alistair Francis
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:51 PM Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > > > If > > > you require Linux 5.1 or later for the port then all or nearly all the > > > architecture-independent pieces required for a 32-bit port supporting only > > > 64-bit times should be

Re: ARCv2 Public PRM (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors)

2020-02-06 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > If > > you require Linux 5.1 or later for the port then all or nearly all the > > architecture-independent pieces required for a 32-bit port supporting only > > 64-bit times should be covered by the RV32 patches, which I think are > > quite close

Re: ARCv2 Public PRM (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors)

2020-01-17 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Vineet Gupta wrote: > The public PRM is now available and I would like you to try and access > it so that any bureaucracy is out of the way before I re-post ARC port > for 2.32 ! Thanks! There was one technical point regarding the glibc port I raised briefly in a

ARCv2 Public PRM (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors)

2020-01-17 Thread Vineet Gupta
Hi Joseph, On 1/30/19 10:15 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 1/29/19 6:29 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >> In the absence of clear consensus regarding consideration of new ports to >> undocumented architectures (which would need to result in consensus on >> suitable rules on the subject to go in >>

Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors

2019-01-30 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Vineet Gupta wrote: > Having said that, wheels were already set in motion after your initial > request in > December. The ARCv2 ABI spec was opened up quickly (and mea culpa for not > referencing it v2 submission). It is now publicly accessibly at [1] Thanks. To be clear,

Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors

2019-01-30 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 1/29/19 6:29 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > In the absence of clear consensus regarding consideration of new ports to > undocumented architectures (which would need to result in consensus on > suitable rules on the subject to go in > ), and in the

Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors

2019-01-29 Thread Joseph Myers
In the absence of clear consensus regarding consideration of new ports to undocumented architectures (which would need to result in consensus on suitable rules on the subject to go in ), and in the absence of suitable public architecture and ABI

[PATCH v2 00/15] glibc port to ARC processors

2019-01-29 Thread Vineet Gupta
Hi, v2 of glibc port to ARC processors from Synopsys. Thx for reviewing the v1 [1], I've hopefully addressed all the comments. Any unlikely omissions are unintended. Also apologies for the bad timing given the imminent release, but that ship has likely already sailed, so we might as well