Hi, Eugeniy,
Sorry that I reply to this email and not to the patch itself, I haven't received
it. It's because of my funny email server :).
On 10/15/2018 05:21 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Maybe you have any comments or remarks about this patch?
> And if you don't could you please apply
Hi!
Maybe you have any comments or remarks about this patch?And if you don't could
you please apply it. Thanks!
On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 14:46 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs
> from other SST series, so add specific implementation
>
Hi!
Maybe you have any comments or remarks about this patch?
And if you don't could you please apply it. Thanks!
On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 14:46 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs
> from other SST series, so add specific implementation
>
Hi Marek,
Maybe you have any comments or remarks about this patch? And if you don't could
you please apply it.
Thanks!
On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 14:46 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs
> from other SST series, so add specific implementation
sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs
from other SST series, so add specific implementation
flash_lock/flash_unlock/flash_is_locked functions for sst26wf
flash ICs.
NOTE:
this patch is basically following mine u-boot commit port:
