I've pulled this into the dma-mapping for-next tree now.
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:22:28 +0100
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Christoph Hellwig
>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>>
>> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
>> > merge it through
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>
> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> > dependency on it
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
> Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
I thought that some of this is a
Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 09:41:15 -0800
> There are enough common defintions that a single header seems nicer.
>
> Also drop the pointless include.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg
Acked-by: David S. Miller
