On 9/1/20 8:51 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
kernel expects entries to be marked huge before we use
set_pmd_at()/set_pud_at().
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 21 -
1 file changed, 12
Le 01/09/2020 à 08:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
On 9/1/20 8:52 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
There is a checkpatch.pl warning here.
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
chars per line)
#7:
Architectures like ppc64 use deposited page table while updating
On 09/01/2020 12:07 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 9/1/20 8:55 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> pte_clear_tests operate on an existing pte entry. Make sure that is not a
>>> none
>>> pte entry.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
On 09/01/2020 01:33 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 21/08/2020 à 10:51, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
>>
>> On 08/19/2020 06:30 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> This patch series includes fixes for debug_vm_pgtable test code so that
>>> they follow page table updates rules correctly. The
On 9/1/20 12:20 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 01/09/2020 à 08:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
On 9/1/20 8:52 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
There is a checkpatch.pl warning here.
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
chars per line)
#7:
Architectures like
On 9/1/20 1:16 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 09/01/2020 01:06 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 9/1/20 1:02 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 09/01/2020 11:51 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 9/1/20 8:45 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
ppc64 use
Le 21/08/2020 à 10:51, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
On 08/19/2020 06:30 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
This patch series includes fixes for debug_vm_pgtable test code so that
they follow page table updates rules correctly. The first two patches introduce
changes w.r.t ppc64. The patches are
On 9/1/20 9:33 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
The seems to be missing quite a lot of details w.r.t allocating
the correct pgtable_t page (huge_pte_alloc()), holding the right
lock (huge_pte_lock()) etc. The vma used is also not a hugetlb VMA.
On 9/1/20 9:11 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
This will help in adding proper locks in a later patch
It really makes sense to classify these tests here as static and dynamic.
Static are the ones that test via page table entry values modification
On 09/01/2020 11:51 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 9/1/20 8:45 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> ppc64 use bit 62 to indicate a pte entry (_PAGE_PTE). Avoid setting that
>>> bit in
>>> random value.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar
On 9/1/20 8:55 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
pte_clear_tests operate on an existing pte entry. Make sure that is not a none
pte entry.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2
On 9/1/20 1:02 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 09/01/2020 11:51 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 9/1/20 8:45 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
ppc64 use bit 62 to indicate a pte entry (_PAGE_PTE). Avoid setting that bit in
random value.
On 9/1/20 8:45 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
ppc64 use bit 62 to indicate a pte entry (_PAGE_PTE). Avoid setting that bit in
random value.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 13 ++---
1 file changed, 10
On 09/01/2020 01:06 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 9/1/20 1:02 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/01/2020 11:51 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> On 9/1/20 8:45 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> ppc64 use bit 62 to indicate
Le 01/09/2020 à 09:40, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
On 9/1/20 12:20 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 01/09/2020 à 08:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
On 9/1/20 8:52 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
There is a checkpatch.pl warning here.
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a
Le 01/09/2020 à 08:30, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
I actually wanted to add #ifdef BROKEN. That test is completely broken.
Infact I would suggest to remove that test completely.
#ifdef will not be required here as there would be a stub definition
for hugetlb_advanced_tests() when
On 9/1/20 8:52 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Architectures like ppc64 use deposited page table while updating the huge pte
entries.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V
---
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
On 9/2/20 9:19 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 09/01/2020 03:28 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 9/1/20 1:08 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 09/01/2020 12:07 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 9/1/20 8:55 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 09/01/2020 01:25 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 9/1/20 1:16 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/01/2020 01:06 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> On 9/1/20 1:02 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 09/01/2020 11:51 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 9/1/20 8:45 AM, Anshuman
On 09/01/2020 01:21 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 01/09/2020 à 09:40, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
>> On 9/1/20 12:20 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 01/09/2020 à 08:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
On 9/1/20 8:52 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
>
> There is
On 09/01/2020 03:28 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 9/1/20 1:08 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/01/2020 12:07 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> On 9/1/20 8:55 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> pte_clear_tests operate on
On 09/01/2020 12:08 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On 9/1/20 9:11 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> This will help in adding proper locks in a later patch
>>
>> It really makes sense to classify these tests here as static and dynamic.
>>
[ 17.080644] [ cut here ]
[ 17.081342] kernel BUG at mm/pgtable-generic.c:164!
[ 17.082091] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 17.082977] Modules linked in:
[ 17.083481] CPU: 79 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W
On 9/1/20 1:08 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 09/01/2020 12:07 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On 9/1/20 8:55 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
pte_clear_tests operate on an existing pte entry. Make sure that is not a none
pte entry.
Signed-off-by:
On 09/01/2020 03:06 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
[ 17.080644] [ cut here ]
[ 17.081342] kernel BUG at mm/pgtable-generic.c:164!
[ 17.082091] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 17.082977] Modules linked in:
[
Cc: Vineet Gupta
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
---
Please ack or nack if you object to this being mered via
Arnd's tree.
arch/arc/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 17 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 9/1/20 7:15 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Cc: Vineet Gupta
> Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta#arch/arc
Thx,
-Vineet
> ---
>
> Please ack or nack if you object to this being mered via
> Arnd's tree.
>
>
Hi Vineet, Evgeniy!
> From: Vineet Gupta
> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:41 PM
> To: Evgeniy Didin ; linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
>
> Cc: Alexey Brodkin ; Eugeniy Paltsev
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: [plat-hsdk]: Switch ethernet phy-mode to rgmii-id
>
> On 7/7/20 8:38 AM,
On 7/7/20 8:38 AM, Evgeniy Didin wrote:
> HSDK board has Micrel KSZ9031, recent commit
> bcf3440c6dd ("net: phy: micrel: add phy-mode support for the KSZ9031 PHY")
> caused a breakdown of Ethernet.
> Using 'phy-mode = "rgmii"' is not correct because accodring RGMII
> specification it is necessary
29 matches
Mail list logo
