Re: [PATCH] bit_spinlock: Include

2023-01-09 Thread Vineet Gupta
On 1/8/23 11:04, Christophe JAILLET wrote: In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax(). (see [1]) It broke on arc. It its just ARC that broke, maybe we can do

Re: [PATCH] bit_spinlock: Include

2023-01-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:04:44 +0100 Christophe JAILLET wrote: > In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it > appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that > was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax(). > (see [1]) > > It broke on arc. > > Include in to fix

Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] sched, smp: Trace IPIs sent via send_call_function_single_ipi()

2023-01-09 Thread Valentin Schneider
On 07/01/23 12:04, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Valentin Schneider wrote: > >> send_call_function_single_ipi() is the thing that sends IPIs at the bottom >> of smp_call_function*() via either generic_exec_single() or >> smp_call_function_many_cond(). Give it an IPI-related tracepoint. >> >> Note that

Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] treewide: Trace IPIs sent via smp_send_reschedule()

2023-01-09 Thread Valentin Schneider
On 08/01/23 20:17, Huacai Chen wrote: > Hi, Valentin, > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 11:59 PM Valentin Schneider > wrote: >> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ extern void show_ipi_list(struct seq_file *p, int prec); >> * it goes straight through and wastes no time serializing >> * anything. Worst case is that

Re: [PATCH] bit_spinlock: Include

2023-01-09 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:04:44PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it > appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that > was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax(). > (see [1]) > > It broke on arc. > > Include in to