Re: Patches for ARC

demar >From 14b15ceb1e98ff9a3cacd99bc1a77ce02e8c8684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Waldemar Brodkorb <w...@uclibc-ng.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:32:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] add MAINTAINERS information Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <w...@uclibc-ng.org> --- MAINTAINERS |

Re: [PATCH] ldso: Force disable -mlong-calls when compiling ldso for ARC

Hi Alexey, Alexey Brodkin wrote, > Even though by default for ARC uClibc gets compiled with > disabled long-calls user may provide UCLIBC_EXTRA_CFLAGS > with "-mlong-calls". With this option uClibc will be > successfully compiled but later it will fail in runtime > because dynamic loader cannot

Re: [PATCH] ARC: Fix max ULP for cosine test

Hi Eugeniy, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote, > Max ULP for "cos (M_PI_6l * 2.0) == 0.5" in "test-double" sub-test > is set to "0" for ARC. It causes "test-double" test failure. > > I realized that this sub-test on ARM gets completely same results. > But it doesn't fails on ARM because max ULP is set to

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] [PATCH] ARC: update .note.ABI-tag for ABIv4

Hi, Thanks, applied and pushed, best regards Waldemar Vineet Gupta wrote, > Cc: Anton Kolesov > Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta > --- > libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S | 6 +- > 1 file changed, 5

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] [PATCH] ARC: string: handle gcc 6.x macro changes

Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, > In gcc 6.x cleanup, the macros got renamed. > (Need to support the old toggle for some more time) Applied and pushed, thx Waldemar ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] ARC uClibc-ng testsuite runs empty ?

Hi, Cupertino Miranda wrote, > Hi Waldemar, > > I have looked into the OpenADK uclibc-tests segmentation fault at hand. > Although, I haven't fully tested the patch I think it is a fix for the > issue. > > Considering how long I took to look into this problem, I decided to > provide you a patch

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] ARC uClibc-ng testsuite runs empty ?

Hi, Vineet Gupta wrote, > On 01/11/2017 12:48 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > I reported the issue to Alexey last year. > > We added your binutils maintainer to the thread. > > Yesterday he had again time to reproduce the problem, but there was > > some missing infor

Re: ARC patch suggestion

wrote, > Hi, > > > > > +CC ARC gnu folks, Anton who maintains an internal build system > > > > > > On 03/22/2017 08:02 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I want to success following change: > > > > >

ARC patch suggestion

Hi, I want to success following change: >From cde74b83f9b204bf56f304224654e4993dc56efc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Waldemar Brodkorb <w...@openadk.org> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:04:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARC: remove special CFLAGS/LDFLAGS handling Either toolchain

static linking broken?

Hi Vineet, it seems static linking is totally broken for ARC and uClibc-ng: file root_nsim-arcv2_uclibc-ng_archs/bin/busybox root_nsim-arcv2_uclibc-ng_archs/bin/busybox: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, *unknown arch 0xc3* version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter *empty*, for GNU/Linux

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] [PATCH] Same iteration variable used for inner and outer loop

Hi Cupertino, Cupertino Miranda wrote, > Inner loop was using same counter variable (i) as the outer loop, therefore > making outer loop terminate before it visited all of the ELF program segments. > Surrounding code in this inner loop clearly shows the intention that this loop > should not

Re: static linking broken?

Hi Alexey, Alexey Brodkin wrote, > Hi Waldemar, > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 14:51 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > > On 04/11/2017 01:52 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > > > > > Hi Vineet, > > > > > > it seems static linking is totally broken

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] [PATCH] ARC: Enable getpt() support in ARC defconfigs

Hi, Vineet Gupta wrote, > On 03/01/2017 10:57 AM, Anton Kolesov wrote: > >> That means for building of our toolchain we'll need to have separately > >> stored > >> "defconfigs" in some form. Let's see what Anton says on that :) > > But why is that - as long as buildroot (or other build systems)

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] [PATCH] ldso: don't discard sysmbols for DODEBUG builds

Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, > the --discard-* toggles take away the symbols which comes in the way > when staring at objdumps for debugging low level issues > > So don't discard symbols for DODEBUG builds Applied and pushed, Thanks Waldemar ___

Re: uclibc test suite with gnu 2017.03 (was Re: [Fwd: Re: nsim latest free version])

Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, > Hi Waldemar, > > >>Hi Waldemar, > >> > >>On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 21:16 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > >>>Hi Alexey, > >>> > >>>I have some issues lately running the testsuite in NSIM. > >

Re: uclibc test suite with gnu 2017.03 (was Re: [Fwd: Re: nsim latest free version])

Hi, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote, > Hi Vineet, > Vineet Gupta wrote, > > > Hi Waldemar, > > > > >>Hi Waldemar, > > >> > > >>On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 21:16 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > >>>Hi Alexey, > > >>&

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] [PATCH v2] Fix subtle race in tst-cancel2 / tst-cancelx2

Hi, patch applied and pushed, just forgot the mail, best regards Waldemar > Am 18.12.2017 um 20:18 schrieb Vineet Gupta : > >> On 12/08/2017 10:07 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> When ran on ARC, these tests would ocassionally fail >> | [ARCLinux]# for i in 1 2 3 4 5

Re: mman.h patch

Hi, Vineet Gupta wrote, > On 02/01/2018 11:43 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I would like to push attached patch next week. > >Any veto? > > So it seems there is code consolidation and additionally there's seems to be > a semantical

Re: uClibc-ng testsuite failures

Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, > On 02/26/2018 11:59 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > >>>The syscall cancellation failures are still there with gcc 7.3.0 and > >>>binutils 2.30. Do you have any patches on top of it? > >>Are you talking about these results? >

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] [uclibc-ng-test] Revert "arc: disable deadlocking test"

hi, Vineet Gupta wrote, > This seems to work fine on ARC ! > > This reverts commit f0567d67075ff7a27ada8ab5bce750fe8a739763. > > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta Thanks, pushed, Waldemar ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list

Re: uClibc-ng testsuite failures

Hi Alexey, Alexey Brodkin wrote, > Hi Waldemar, > > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 21:50 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > Hi Vineet, > > Vineet Gupta wrote, > > > > > On 02/26/2018 11:59 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > > > > > > The syscal

Re: tst-atomic

Hi Alexey, Alexey Brodkin wrote, > Hi Waldemar, > > I see in commit e65912f8b2a6 ("rework most tests to work as standalone > package") > "tst-atomic" and "tst-atomic-long" were marked as disabled for all > architectures > as opposed to previously (in times of test-suite being a part of uClibc)

Re: uClibc-ng testsuite failures

Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote, > > AFAIK gcc 8 is not released yet, so upstream/master ! > > >Last time there was some issue with gcc8 and you told me to use gcc7 > >with some patches. > > Right there was yet another code gen issue / ICE at the time, which is > likely gone now. But gcc

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] state of uClibc ARC soft-float support

Hi Vineet, I tried to sync the libm tests from glibc to uClibc-ng, but I think I broke it. May be we should revert the commit? 3384c45e66ddf18f235654b67ae34ac7dcb07534 best regards Waldemar Vineet Gupta wrote, > Hi Waldemar, > > After test-suite commit 9f079b6353 "(disable complex math)" the

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] state of uClibc ARC soft-float support

Hi Alexey, Alexey Brodkin wrote, > Hi Waldemar, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Waldemar Brodkorb > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 1:26 PM > > To: Vineet Gupta > > Cc: de...@uclibc-ng.org; arcml ; Alexey > > Brodkin > > > > S