Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] sched, smp: Trace IPIs sent via send_call_function_single_ipi()

ny IPI sent via __smp_call_single_queue(), > which covers __ttwu_queue_wakelist() and irq_work_queue_on() "for free". > > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Patch series logistics: - No objections from the scheduler s

Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Avoid unnecessary page fault retires on shared memory types

arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 4 ++++ Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Minor comment typo: > + /* > + * We should do the same as VM_FAULT_RETRY, but let's not > + * return -EBUSY since that's not reflecting the reality on > + * wha

Re: [PATCH V9] mm/debug: Add tests validating architecture page table helpers

mal, and DEBUG_VM increases size anyway. Other than that this looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page table helpers

* Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 03:06:17PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > > > This adds a test module which will validate architecture page table > > > helpers > > > and accessor

Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] mm/pgtable/debug: Add test validating architecture page table helpers

* Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This adds a test module which will validate architecture page table helpers > and accessors regarding compliance with generic MM semantics expectations. > This will help various architectures in validating changes to the existing > page table helpers or addition of

Re: [PATCH 12/26] x86: clean up ioremap

arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c| 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Re: [PATCH] Extract initrd free logic from arch-specific code.

* Shea Levy wrote: > > Please also put it into Documentation/features/. > > I switched this patch series (the latest revision v6 was just posted) to > using weak symbols instead of Kconfig. Does it still warrant documentation? Probably not. Thanks, Ingo

Re: [PATCH] Extract initrd free logic from arch-specific code.

* Shea Levy wrote: > Now only those architectures that have custom initrd free requirements > need to define free_initrd_mem. > > Signed-off-by: Shea Levy Please put the Kconfig symbol name this patch introduces both into the title, so that people know

Re: Build failures in -next due to 'locking/atomic, arch/arc: Implement atomic_fetch_{add,sub,and,andnot,or,xor}()'

* Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:39:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:36:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > Hi Peter, > > > > > > I am seeing build failures in -next when trying to build arc / arcv2 > > > targets. >