On Thu 2021-01-07 21:18:20, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 1/7/21 7:48 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (21/01/07 09:58), Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > On 1/7/21 9:04 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > On Thu 2021-01-07 08:43:16, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > > > Hi
On Thu 2021-01-07 08:43:16, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 1/7/21 1:02 AM, John Ogness wrote:
> > Hi Vineet,
> >
> > On 2021-01-06, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > This breaks ARC booting (no output on console).
> >
> > Could you provide the kernel boot arguments that you use? This series is
>
On Wed 2021-01-06 15:36:36, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> +CC Buildroot folks
>
> Hi Petr,
>
> On 11/11/20 5:54 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > stdin, stdout, and stderr standard I/O stream are created for the init
> > process. They are not available when there is no console regi
On Wed 2019-11-13 15:33:34, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (19/11/13 02:25), Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > I guess I've pointed that in my point of view price for one-time testing
> > code is cheaper than adding a new printk feature to swap log levels on
> > the fly.
> [..]
> > I've gone through functi
On Tue 2019-11-12 13:57:04, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (19/11/12 13:44), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [..]
> > > But yes, this per-code-section loglevel is problematic. The feedback
> > > against the patchset shows that people want it also the other way.
> > > I mean to keep pr_debug() as pr_deb
On Mon 2019-11-11 10:23:36, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (19/11/08 14:04), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > I agree that it is complicated to pass the loglevel as
> > a parameter. It would be better define the default
> > log level for a given code section. It might be store
On Fri 2019-11-08 19:37:19, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (19/11/06 09:35), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > I agree with all the other justification.
> >
> > I would add. The backtrace is really useful for debugging. It should
> > be possible to print it even in less criti
On Wed 2019-11-06 03:04:51, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> Add log level argument to show_stack().
> Done in three stages:
> 1. Introducing show_stack_loglvl() for every architecture
> 2. Migrating old users with an explicit log level
> 3. Renaming show_stack_loglvl() into show_stack()
>
> Justification:
t; include/linux/memblock.h | 35 ---
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 9 +----
For printk:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek
Acked-by: Petr Mladek
Best Regards,
Petr
> mm/memblock.c | 35 --
On Wed 2019-01-16 15:44:21, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> As all the memblock allocation functions return NULL in case of error
> rather than panic(), the duplicates with _nopanic suffix can be removed.
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index c4f0a41..ae65221 100644
On Mon 2018-01-08 11:09:42, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/05/18 15:42), Petr Mladek wrote:
> >
> > I am all for it. But I would postpone this removal to 4.17.
> > The reason is rather ugly. 13th patch is already in arc tree.
> > We would need to shuffle the patch
On Fri 2018-01-05 19:25:38, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/05/18 19:21), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (01/05/18 11:03), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > [..]
> > > Anyway, print_symbol() is an old weird API and it would be nice
> > > to eventually get rid of i
On Fri 2018-01-05 21:23:34, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/05/18 21:01), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [..]
> > but, print_symbol() is compiled out on !CONFIG_KALLSYMS systems. so,
> > basically, we compile out some of errors print outs; even more, on ia64
> > ia64_do_show_stack() does nothing wh
On Fri 2018-01-05 19:21:05, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/05/18 11:03), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > Anyway, print_symbol() is an old weird API and it would be nice
> > to eventually get rid of it. I could take this patches into
> > printk.git.
>
> no object
On Mon 2017-12-11 21:50:12, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A rather automatic replacement of print_symbol()
> with direct printk() calls. print_symbol() uses extra stack
> buffer (KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN 128 bytes) and, basically, should
> be identical to printk(%pS).
To make it clear
Hi Eigeniy,
I am sorry for the late response. The problem is far from
trivial. I am getting snowed under many other tasks as well.
On Wed 2017-09-06 17:57:18, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 16:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Mon 2017-08-28 19
On Mon 2017-08-28 19:58:07, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> In the current implementation we take the first console that
> registers if we didn't select one.
>
> But if we specify console via "stdout-path" property in device tree
> we don't want first console that registers here to be selected.
> Otherwi
17 matches
Mail list logo
