On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:02:20 +0200
Petr Mladek wrote:
> > I'm somewhat curious whether we can actually remove that trace event.
>
> Good question.
>
> Well, I think that it might be useful. It allows to see trace and
> printk messages together.
Yes people still use it. I was just asked about
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:02 PM Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> On Thu 2022-06-09 20:30:58, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > My emails are getting rejected... Let me try web-interface
>
> Bad day for mail sending. I have problems as well ;-)
For me the problem is still there and apparently it's an "too many
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 10:06 PM Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> Makes sense. Feel free to use for this patch:
>
> Acked-by: Petr Mladek
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
My emails are getting rejected... Let me try web-interface
Kudos to Petr for the questions and thanks to PeterZ for the answers.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 7:02 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This is the tracepoint used to spool all of printk into ftrace, I
> suspect there's users, but I haven't used
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:16:46AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2022-06-08 16:27:47, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > The problem, per commit fc98c3c8c9dc ("printk: use rcuidle console
> > tracepoint"), was printk usage from the cpuidle path where RCU was
> > already disabled.
> >
> > Per the
The problem, per commit fc98c3c8c9dc ("printk: use rcuidle console
tracepoint"), was printk usage from the cpuidle path where RCU was
already disabled.
Per the patches earlier in this series, this is no longer the case.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
---
kernel/printk/printk.c |2 +-
