Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-06 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
On 3/3/23 17:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Fri, Mar 3, 2023, at 12:59, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: On 3/2/23 20:50, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On March 1, 2023 7:17:18 PM PST, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: Commit 622021cd6c560ce7 ("s390: make command line configurable"), I assume? Yes, sorry for that. I got

Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023, at 12:59, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > On 3/2/23 20:50, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On March 1, 2023 7:17:18 PM PST, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > Commit 622021cd6c560ce7 ("s390: make command line configurable"), > I assume? Yes, sorry for that. I got distracted while

Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-03 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
Hi Peter, On 3/2/23 20:50, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On March 1, 2023 7:17:18 PM PST, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:19:02 PST (-0800), h...@linux.ibm.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:58:17AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Heiko, On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:39 AM Heiko

Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-02 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On March 1, 2023 7:17:18 PM PST, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:19:02 PST (-0800), h...@linux.ibm.com wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:58:17AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> Hi Heiko, >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:39 AM Heiko Carstens wrote: >>> > On Tue, Feb 14,

Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-02 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:17 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:19:02 PST (-0800), h...@linux.ibm.com wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:58:17AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Hi Heiko, > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:39 AM Heiko Carstens wrote: > >> > On Tue, Feb

Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-03-01 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 01:19:02 PST (-0800), h...@linux.ibm.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:58:17AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Heiko, On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:39 AM Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:49:01AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > This all came up in

Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-02-14 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:58:17AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:39 AM Heiko Carstens wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:49:01AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > > This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the > > > RISC-V

Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-02-14 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Heiko, On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:39 AM Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:49:01AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the > > RISC-V port. In theory that's a UABI break, as COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is the > > maximum

Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-02-14 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:49:01AM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the > RISC-V port. In theory that's a UABI break, as COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is the > maximum length of /proc/cmdline and userspace could staticly rely on > that to be

[PATCH v3 00/24] Remove COMMAND_LINE_SIZE from uapi

2023-02-13 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
This all came up in the context of increasing COMMAND_LINE_SIZE in the RISC-V port. In theory that's a UABI break, as COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is the maximum length of /proc/cmdline and userspace could staticly rely on that to be correct. Usually I wouldn't mess around with changing this sort of thing,