On 24/06/2022 16:16, Serge Semin wrote:
> In accordance with the Generic EHCI/OHCI bindings the corresponding node
> name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
> requires the USB nodes to have the name acceptable by the regexp:
> "^usb(@.*)?" . Make sure the "generic-ehci"
On 24/06/2022 16:16, Serge Semin wrote:
> In accordance with the DWC USB3 bindings the corresponding node
> name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
> requires the USB nodes to have the name acceptable by the regexp:
> "^usb(@.*)?" . Make sure the "snps,dwc3"-compatible
On 24/06/2022 16:16, Serge Semin wrote:
> In accordance with the DWC USB3 bindings the corresponding node
> name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
> requires the USB nodes to have the name acceptable by the regexp:
> "^usb(@.*)?" . Make sure the "snps,dwc3"-compatible
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:16:18 +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> In accordance with the Generic EHCI/OHCI bindings the corresponding node
> name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
> requires the USB nodes to have the name acceptable by the regexp:
> "^usb(@.*)?" . Make sure the
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 07:18:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/06/2022 16:16, Serge Semin wrote:
> > In accordance with the DWC USB3 bindings the corresponding node
> > name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
> > requires the USB nodes to have the name
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 07:17:53PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/06/2022 16:16, Serge Semin wrote:
> > In accordance with the DWC USB3 bindings the corresponding node
> > name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
> > requires the USB nodes to have the name
On 6/24/22 07:16, Serge Semin wrote:
In accordance with the Generic EHCI/OHCI bindings the corresponding node
name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
requires the USB nodes to have the name acceptable by the regexp:
"^usb(@.*)?" . Make sure the "generic-ehci" and
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 07:14:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/06/2022 16:16, Serge Semin wrote:
> > In accordance with the Generic EHCI/OHCI bindings the corresponding node
> > name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
> > requires the USB nodes to have the
For csky part.
Acked-by: Guo Ren
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:48 PM Anshuman Khandual
wrote:
>
> This enables ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT on the platform and exports standard
> vm_get_page_prot() implementation via DECLARE_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT, which looks
> up a private and static protection_map[]
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 03:11:43PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
> On 6/24/22 07:16, Serge Semin wrote:
> > In accordance with the Generic EHCI/OHCI bindings the corresponding node
> > name is suppose to comply with the Generic USB HCD DT schema, which
> > requires the USB nodes to have the name
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:13:23AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This enables ARCH_HAS_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT on the platform and exports standard
> vm_get_page_prot() implementation via DECLARE_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT, which looks
> up a private and static protection_map[] array. Subsequently all __SXXX
On 6/24/22 10:39, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:13:15AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This just converts the generic vm_get_page_prot() implementation into a new
>> macro i.e DECLARE_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT which later can be used across platforms
>> when enabling them
On 6/24/22 10:58, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
> Le 24/06/2022 à 06:43, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
>> This just converts the generic vm_get_page_prot() implementation into a new
>> macro i.e DECLARE_VM_GET_PAGE_PROT which later can be used across platforms
>> when enabling them with
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:13:18AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This moves protection_map[] inside the platform and makes it a static.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas
> Cc: Will Deacon
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual
14 matches
Mail list logo