On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 06:20:28PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 07:19:33PM +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > As of today the CONFIG_USB isn't explicitly present in HSDK defconfig
> > as it is implicitly forcibly enabled by UDL driver which selects CONFIG_USB
> > in its
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 07:19:33PM +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> As of today the CONFIG_USB isn't explicitly present in HSDK defconfig
> as it is implicitly forcibly enabled by UDL driver which selects CONFIG_USB
> in its kconfig.
> The commit 5d50bd440bc2 ("drm/udl: Make udl driver depend on
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:22 AM Eugeniy Paltsev
wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> I'm wondering what is proper way to deal with such type of regressions?
> Is is responsibility of person who change kconfig to check (and possibly
> adjust) affected defconfigs?
I think the patch submitter should take
From: Eugeniy Paltsev
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 19:19
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Vineet Gupta
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Alexey Brodkin; Masahiro Yamada; Thomas
Zimmermann; Eugeniy Paltsev
Subject: [PATCH] ARC: [plat-hsdk]: fix USB regression
As of today the CONFIG_USB isn't
As of today the CONFIG_USB isn't explicitly present in HSDK defconfig
as it is implicitly forcibly enabled by UDL driver which selects CONFIG_USB
in its kconfig.
The commit 5d50bd440bc2 ("drm/udl: Make udl driver depend on CONFIG_USB")
reverse the dependencies between UDL and USB so UDL now
