On 08/13/2017 10:34 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On 08/11/2017 10:55 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
I was hoping to avoid the addition of extra source files for zero code
gain, though your proposal does work. However, since the platform
would be added unconditionally, would it make more sense to add
On 08/11/2017 10:55 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
I was hoping to avoid the addition of extra source files for zero code gain,
though your proposal does work. However, since the platform would be added
unconditionally, would it make more sense to add the
.compatible = "adaptrum,anarion"
On 08/11/2017 10:55 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
Does that work for you ?
I was hoping to avoid the addition of extra source files for zero code gain,
though your proposal does work. However, since the platform would be added
unconditionally, would it make more sense to add the
.compatible
Hi Vineet,
On 08/10/2017 06:07 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Hi Alexandru,
On 08/11/2017 12:58 AM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
Hi,
Looking under arch/arc, I see the current way is to add a
plat-[socname] for each new SoC. However, it seems that plat-sim, and
plat-tb10x are just place-holders for the
Hi Alexandru,
On 08/11/2017 12:58 AM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
Hi,
Looking under arch/arc, I see the current way is to add a plat-[socname] for each
new SoC. However, it seems that plat-sim, and plat-tb10x are just place-holders
for the compatible bindings.
I was going to do the same for
