Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h

2018-12-11 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I've pulled this into the dma-mapping for-next tree now.

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h

2018-12-10 Thread David Miller
From: Christoph Hellwig 
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:22:28 +0100

> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Christoph Hellwig 
>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>> 
>> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree?  I could also
>> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
>> > dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
>> 
>> I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping
>> work and overall consolidation you are doing.  So I kinda assumed
>> you wanted to merge it via your tree.
>> 
>> I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window,
>> so it could very easily go through your tree.
>> 
>> Let me know if you still want me to merge this.
> 
> These patches are purely cleanups I found while auditing the DMA
> mapping code, at least as of now there are no dependencies.
> 
> That being said now that I looked into it a bit more they do however
> depend on the ->mapping_error removal, so I'll take them through
> the dma-mapping tree.

Ok, thanks.

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h

2018-12-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig 
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
> 
> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree?  I could also
> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> > dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
> 
> I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping
> work and overall consolidation you are doing.  So I kinda assumed
> you wanted to merge it via your tree.
> 
> I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window,
> so it could very easily go through your tree.
> 
> Let me know if you still want me to merge this.

These patches are purely cleanups I found while auditing the DMA
mapping code, at least as of now there are no dependencies.

That being said now that I looked into it a bit more they do however
depend on the ->mapping_error removal, so I'll take them through
the dma-mapping tree.

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h

2018-12-10 Thread David Miller
From: Christoph Hellwig 
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100

> Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree?  I could also
> merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.

I thought that some of this is a prerequisite for the DMA mapping
work and overall consolidation you are doing.  So I kinda assumed
you wanted to merge it via your tree.

I anticipate no conflicts at all, even until the next merge window,
so it could very easily go through your tree.

Let me know if you still want me to merge this.

Thanks.

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h

2018-12-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree?  I could also
merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc


Re: [PATCH 6/6] sparc: merge 32-bit and 64-bit version of pci.h

2018-12-08 Thread David Miller
From: Christoph Hellwig 
Date: Sat,  8 Dec 2018 09:41:15 -0800

> There are enough common defintions that a single header seems nicer.
> 
> Also drop the pointless  include.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig 
> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg 

Acked-by: David S. Miller 

___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc