[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] sunxi-tools: refine progress updates by adjusting transfer chunk size

Hi Alex! Thanks for the reply. I've been wondering that, since the was no new soc_id or special code to handle the R8 in sunxi-fel. I've added the R8 to the wiki page accordingly. Regards, B. Nortmann Am 16.11.2015 um 23:26 schrieb Alexander Kaplan: Hi Bernhard, I observe roughly ~500 KB/s

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] sunxi-tools: refine progress updates by adjusting transfer chunk size

Hello Alex! Good catch, the AW_FEL_VERSION request caused by progress_chunk_size() might in fact arrive in an untimely manner there. Basically we'd have to make sure we retrieve the aw_fel_get_sram_info() beforehand. I'm not sure there would be a more useful place for that even earlier,

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] sunxi-tools: refine progress updates by adjusting transfer chunk size

p 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:45:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 5/9] sunxi-tools: refine progress updates by adjusting transfer chunk size Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 1/9] sunxi-tools: introduce progress framework

there. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- Makefile | 2 +- fel.c | 9 + progress.c | 46 ++ progress.h | 34 ++ 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) creat

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 2/9] sunxi-tools: refactor aw_fel_write()

fill" or "clear" commands. There is some deliberate code duplication here that makes sense when combined with the next patch, where the aw_usb_write() call will differ. We want aw_fel_write() to enforce no progress update/callback, while aw_write_buffer() will (optionally) suppo

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 8/9] sunxi-tools: extend progress framework to support multiple transfers

the actual progress callbacks. Instead, modified "total" values are fed to the callback function. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- progress.c | 38 ++ progress.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+),

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 5/9] sunxi-tools: refine progress updates by adjusting transfer chunk size

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 42 -- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fel.c b/fel.c index aa30fa6..9b9a622 100644 --- a/fel.c +++ b/fel.c @@ -79,12 +79,18 @@ static void pr_info

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 6/9] sunxi-tools: extend progress display with transfer rate and ETA

Also add "--noprogress" option to turn progress display off again (for subsequent commands). Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 5 + progress.c | 52 +--- progress.h | 3 +++ 3 f

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 9/9] sunxi-tools: add "--multiwrite" option for shared progress display

progress of a full-featured system transferred via FEL (kernel, DTB, boot script and initrd). Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 63 +++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 4/9] sunxi-tools: implement simple progress bar for larger transfers

ill ignore any smaller transfers, i.e. those that complete in a single loop iteration. In other words: progress will only be shown if the transfer size requires multiple chunks to be sent. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 17 +

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 3/9] sunxi-tools: extend usb_bulk_send() for progress updates

ced inactive in most other places, e.g. aw_fel_write_uboot_image(). Also, we specifically want the internal use of aw_fel_write() to never use it. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 37 +++-- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 0/9] sunxi-tools: support progress display for FEL utility

@Alex: Since you were the one initially proposing the progress display feature (and seem to have actual use cases), I would appreciate if you could test and/or possibly "ack" the relevant patches. I've done my own limited testing but may not have covered everything, so any feedback is welcome.

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 7/9] sunxi-tools: support FEL progress gauge via dialog utility

le "--xgauge" outputs extended information to update the dialog prompt. Both are meant for directly piping the output: sunxi-fel -g <...> | dialog --gauge "FEL upload progress" 6 70 Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nort

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH sunxi-tools 1/2] fel: Support for enabling MMU after running SPL on new SoC variants

+ * that the BROM FEL protocol implementation relies on a memcpy loop somewhere + * on the perfromance critical path when transferring data over USB. The older + * SoC variants (A10/A13/A20/A31/A23) already have MMU enabled and we only need nitpick: you have a typo in there -

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Subject: [PATCH sunxi-tools 1/1] option --progress: shows progress bar for large transfers

Hi Siarhei! Am 11.11.2015 um 01:16 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: [...] Hello, If I understand the problem correctly, it is all about slow USB transfer speed. We have two possible ways to deal with it: 1. Improve the performance to finish the job faster 2. Entertain the user while the

[linux-sunxi] Re: Subject: [PATCH sunxi-tools 1/1] option --progress: shows progress bar for large transfers

I've transformed this into a pull request: https://github.com/linux-sunxi/sunxi-tools/pull/35 Let me know if you'd prefer a set of patches sent to the mailing list (@Siarhei?). Regards, B. Nortmann Am 29.10.2015 um 16:55 schrieb Alexander Kaplan: Hi Bernhard, thanks for picking this up.

[linux-sunxi] Re: Subject: [PATCH sunxi-tools 1/1] option --progress: shows progress bar for large transfers

Hi Alex! Am Freitag, 23. Oktober 2015 22:22:24 UTC+2 schrieb kapla...@gmail.com: Hi, I added an option --progress (or -p for short) to display a progress bar during large transfers. Hope it is useful. Alex --- fel.c | 80 +--

[linux-sunxi] Re: Subject: [PATCH sunxi-tools 1/1] option --progress: shows progress bar for large transfers

oups.google.com/d/optout. From 88e5f4235758a7ed6464c76a6135aaaec3b30ef4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:48:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2] sunxi-tools: option --progress: shows progress bar for large transfers Based on https://groups.google.com/forum/#!t

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v4 2/3] sunxi-tools: implement persistent sram_info information

to call aw_fel_get_sram_info() wherever needed, while avoiding additional aw_fel_get_version() lookups, and potential surplus "no 'soc_sram_info' data for your SoC" warnings. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 31 ---

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sunxi-tools: factor out persistent version and sram_info information

Am 26.09.2015 um 22:06 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: What kind of problem are you trying to solve in the first place? Is it just for suppressing multiple prints of the "unsupported soc type" warning? Basically: yes. Initially you got me triggered on that with your very first comment. Admittedly I

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v4 0/3] sunxi-tools: usb boot patches

new "sunxi" SPL header and some modifications to fel.c will allow the fel utility to pass information to U-Boot. In case of an FEL boot, our goal is to have a way of auto-executing a boot script that was transferred to DRAM (via "fel") before actual U-Boot startup. Regards, B.

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v4 1/3] sunxi-tools: refactor image type detection/query

This patch moves retrieving the image header type into a function of its own. The idea is that fel "write" can and will also make use of this function to detect boot scripts (by IH_TYPE_SCRIPT). Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de>

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v4 3/3] sunxi-tools: add a mechanism to provide boot information via FEL

y location of the boot script file (boot.scr) this way. A suitably modified U-Boot can adjust the boot process accordingly and will auto-execute the script. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 65 - 1

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sunxi-tools: factor out persistent version and sram_info information

Am 16.09.2015 um 03:15 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: Yes, caching the pointer inside of aw_fel_get_sram_info() function and avoiding repeated usb requests is a good idea. Just make it a static variable instead of global. Retrieving the version information (struct aw_fel_version) involves a USB

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sunxi-tools: factor out persistent version and sram_info information

e function multiple times / wherever needed. What do you think? Regards, B. Nortmann Am 14.09.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Bernhard Nortmann: Hello Siarhei! Am 13.09.2015 um 23:42 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: With this change, we are going to print "Warning: no 'soc_sram_info' data for your SoC"

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 2/3] sunxi-tools: factor out persistent version and sram_info information

FEL version information and SoC-specific memory layout are used across several places in the fel utility code. To avoid having to retrieve this information repeatedly, this patch introduces suitable variables to the main() function scope. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 0/3] sunxi-tools: usb boot patches

. Nortmann Bernhard Nortmann (3): sunxi-tools: refactor image type detection/query sunxi-tools: factor out persistent version and sram_info information sunxi-tools: add a mechanism to provide boot information via FEL fel.c | 181

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 1/3] sunxi-tools: refactor image type detection/query

This patch moves retrieving the image header type into a function of its own. The idea is that fel "write" can and will also make use of this function to detect boot scripts (by IH_TYPE_SCRIPT). Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de>

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 3/3] sunxi-tools: add a mechanism to provide boot information via FEL

y location of the boot script file (boot.scr) this way. A suitably modified U-Boot can adjust the boot process accordingly and will auto-execute the script. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 62 +- 1

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] sunxi-tools: refactor image type detection/query

Am 09.09.2015 um 06:33 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: +uint8_t get_image_type(const uint8_t *buf, int error) IMHO, this is not the nicest looking API. We get a buffer pointer here, but not the buffer size, so it is implicitly assumed to be large enough. The use of the error flag is not very

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/2] sunxi-tools: provide FEL boot (script) information

Am 09.09.2015 um 07:00 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: Thanks. The commit messages are great and very detailed. Functionality-wise, this looks good to me. Implementation-wise, there are a few comments (posted as separate replies). Also should we wait until the U-Boot changes are reviewed by Ian or

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/2] sunxi-tools: add a mechanism to provide boot information via FEL

Am 09.09.2015 um 06:52 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: I'm not sure if it is a good idea to add all these checks into the 'aw_fel_write()' function. This function is a low level primitive operation and overloading it with extra functionality is not great. On the other hand, we also support "write"

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/2] sunxi-tools: fix compiler warnings due to deprecated _BSD_SOURCE

Am 08.09.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/feature_test_macros.7.html "To allow code that requires _BSD_SOURCE in glibc 2.19 and earlier and _DEFAULT_SOURCE in glibc 2.20 and later to compile without warnings, define both _BSD_SOURCE and

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 2/2] sunxi-tools: fix compiler warnings due to deprecated _BSD_SOURCE

les/611162/. This patch adds the required _DEFAULT_SOURCE. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 2 ++ phoenix_info.c | 2 ++ pio.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/fel.c b/fel.c index f96cc78..98e8d89 100644 --- a/f

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 1/2] sunxi-tools: fix typo

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> Acked-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamas...@gmail.com> --- fel.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fel.c b/fel.c index c29df86..f96cc78 100644 --- a/fel.c +++ b/fel.c @@ -863,7 +8

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 1/3] sunxi-tools: refactor image type detection/query

This patch moves retrieving the image header type into a function of its own. The idea is that aw_fel_write() can and will also make use of this function to detect boot scripts (by IH_TYPE_SCRIPT). Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 2/3] sunxi-tools: factor out persistent version and sram_info information

FEL version information and SoC-specific memory layout are used across several places in the fel utility code. To avoid having to retrieve this information repeatedly, this patch introduces suitable variables to the main() function scope. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 3/3] sunxi-tools: add a mechanism to provide boot information via FEL

by address and size. Currently the typical use case is to provide the memory location of the boot script file (boot.scr). A suitably modified U-Boot can adjust the boot process accordingly and will auto-execute the script. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de>

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 0/3] sunxi-tools: provide FEL boot (script) information

e actual U-Boot startup. Regards, B. Nortmann Bernhard Nortmann (3): sunxi-tools: refactor image type detection/query sunxi-tools: factor out persistent version and sram_info information sunxi-tools: add a mechanism to provide boot informatio

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/2] sunxi-tools: fix compiler warnings due to deprecated _BSD_SOURCE

les/611162/. This patch contains the recommended changes from _BSD_SOURCE to _DEFAULT_SOURCE. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.c | 4 ++-- phoenix_info.c | 4 ++-- pio.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fel

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] sunxi-tools: refactor image type detection/query

This patch moves retrieving the image header type into a function of its own. The idea is that aw_fel_write() can and will also make use of this function to detect boot scripts (by IH_TYPE_SCRIPT). Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de> --- fel.

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/2] sunxi-tools: provide FEL boot (script) information

ow the fel utility to pass information to U-Boot. In case of an FEL boot, our goal is to have a way of auto-executing a boot script that was transferred to DRAM (via "fel") before actual U-Boot startup. Regards, B. Nortmann Bernhard Nortmann (2): sunxi-tools: refactor image type detection

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/2] sunxi-tools: add a mechanism to provide boot information via FEL

by address and size. Currently the typical use case is to provide the memory location of the boot script file (boot.scr). A suitably modified U-Boot can adjust the boot process accordingly and will auto-execute the script. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann <bernhard.nortm...@web.de>

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi-tools: [RFC] extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

Hi Siarhei! Am 01.09.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: The SPL header is Allwinner specific and we are kinda in control of it. The U-Boot header is used for a wide range of devices and architectures and you should be prepared to encounter a (perfectly justified) opposition if you propose

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi-tools: [RFC] extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

Hi Siarhei, hello Hans! Am 01.09.2015 um 00:58 schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:57:54 +0200 > Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 31-08-15 13:45, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: >>> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:54:36 +0100 >>> Ian Campbell

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/2] sunxi-tools: prevent possible out-of-bounds memory access

Am 21.08.2015 03:34, schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: My compiler happens to be anal about this: fel.c: In function ‘aw_fel_process_spl_and_uboot’: fel.c:838:11: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare] if (size SPL_LEN_LIMIT) ^ This warning

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/3] Fix signedness (possible underflow) of len parameter for aw_fel_write_uboot_image()

Hi Siarhei! Those are some good arguments. I have prepared two separate patches to follow up on this, which should apply nicely/easily. Regards, B. Nortmann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups linux-sunxi group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/3] Reworked usb-boot script that uses new fel uboot command

Hello Siarhei! We've been discussing that usb-boot script (and the Wiki stuff related) on IRC. I agree that it's pretty much obsolete now that fel uboot gracefully handles most of these tasks. You voted for (and I agreed on) removing the script in the near future, and only reference it for

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] Support chip IDs (SoC names) for A33, A80 and A83T

Am 19.08.2015 17:07, schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: I guess, this patch is now superseded by the recent patches from Vishnu Patekar, which add full support for H3, A83T and A33. Full ACK. The patch was just there to introduce a better SoC ID identification for end user's convenience. I'd still

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/2] sunxi-tools: make uboot_autostart local instead of global

Narrow down the scope of the uboot_autostart variable. The flag can be made local to main(), there's no need to keep it global. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann bernhard.nortm...@web.de --- fel.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fel.c b/fel.c index a5cb99d

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] sunxi-tools: prevent possible out-of-bounds memory access

to aw_fel_write_uboot_image() as size_t len. This might incorrectly let that function assume a u-boot binary was passed, when actually it isn't supposed to act on the buffer at all. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann bernhard.nortm...@web.de --- fel.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 0/2] sunxi-tools: fel.c patches

This is a set of two patches following up on https://groups.google.com/d/msg/linux-sunxi/X9Vcg7dVt9w/rRPYv4sIBgAJ Bernhard Nortmann (2): sunxi-tools: prevent possible out-of-bounds memory access sunxi-tools: make uboot_autostart local instead of global fel.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/3] Fix signedness (possible underflow) of len parameter for aw_fel_write_uboot_image()

2001 From: Bernhard Nortmann bernhard.nortm...@web.de Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:57:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3 v2] sunxi-tools: Prevent signed values (fix possible underflow) of len parameter for aw_fel_write_uboot_image(), and narrow down scope for uboot_autostart Signed-off-by: Bernhard

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/3] Fix signedness (possible underflow) of len parameter for aw_fel_write_uboot_image()

Am 04.08.2015 10:33, schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: Hi, If anyone wonders, that's a sunxi-tools patch. To avoid confusion in the future, it's best to have this information in the subject line. Yes, sorry - I forgot to add the sunxi-tools prefix, and also didn't CC you as the maintainer. Thanks

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/3] Fix signedness (possible underflow) of len parameter for aw_fel_write_uboot_image()

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann bernhard.nortm...@web.de --- fel.c | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fel.c b/fel.c index 41b19c9..bbaeec9 100644 --- a/fel.c +++ b/fel.c @@ -215,8 +215,7 @@ void aw_fel_write(libusb_device_handle *usb, void *buf

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/3] Reworked usb-boot script that uses new fel uboot command

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann bernhard.nortm...@web.de --- usb-boot | 116 +-- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) diff --git a/usb-boot b/usb-boot index 3881d29..be34004 100755 --- a/usb-boot +++ b/usb-boot @@ -20,72

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/3] Support chip IDs (SoC names) for A33, A80 and A83T

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann bernhard.nortm...@web.de --- fel.c | 21 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fel.c b/fel.c index bbaeec9..95c3ee2 100644 --- a/fel.c +++ b/fel.c @@ -186,14 +186,20 @@ void aw_fel_print_version(libusb_device_handle

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi-tools: [RFC] extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

Am 15.07.2015 12:56, schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:21:45 +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: Perhaps a simpler thing which would get 80% of the benefit would be to add an --exec flag to the existing command? (Or default on and a flag to not do it, as people

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v3 0/1] sunxi-tools: extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

is again based on the current b80e7ce7bd5c2015465c2fd0e5990d47c05c7f8e commit within the github linux-sunxi repo. Let me know in case that needs to be adjusted.) Regards, B. Nortmann Bernhard Nortmann (1): sunxi-tools: extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary fel.c | 124

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2] sunxi-tools: extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

Looking at that code / diff, the test for (size_main 0) is insufficient. If we're intending to access the header fields, it's probably better/safer to test for (size_main HEADER_SIZE) instead: Regards, B. Nortmann diff --git a/fel.c b/fel.c index de8afad..2fd215a 100644 --- a/fel.c +++

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi-tools: [RFC] extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

Hello Siarhei! Am 12.07.2015 13:49, schrieb Siarhei Siamashka: Regarding the new uboot command. We can probably make it execute the u-boot code too, but just postpone the execution (so that it is done only after the command line parsing is fully finished). For additional safety, the subsequent

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2] sunxi-tools: extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

to get a proper FEL setup - e.g. it avoids having to select u-boot.bin vs. u-boot-dtb.bin, see e.g. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-June/217476.html Original patch/RFC was here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux-sunxi/wBEGUoLNRro Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann bernhard.nortm

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi-tools: [RFC] extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

Am 07.07.2015 11:19, schrieb Hans de Goede: We could agree upon a special magic signature between the fel tool and the sunxi u-boot code which means that u-boot should patch its boot_cmd in the env to load a script from DRAM (at a fixed offset). We could always do the boot_cmd patching when in

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi-tools: [RFC] extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

Am 06.07.2015 16:28, schrieb Ian Campbell: On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 14:11 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Ah right, I guess that makes sense, but if this is not going to be a fire and forget command, and people still need to run more fel commands after it then I'm wondering it this is worth the

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi-tools: [RFC] extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

Hello Hans! Am 05.07.2015 11:54, schrieb Hans de Goede: This seems like a good idea to me, am I reading both the --help and the code correctly that this only writes u-boot but does not do the necessary fel exe 0x. ? It seems to me that such a command should also execute u-boot. You're

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH] sunxi-tools: [RFC] extend fel utility to handle SPL + U-Boot binary

, the idea of this modification is to prevent users mixing up u-boot.bin and u-boot-dtb.bin (possibly unconscious, e.g. by relying on outdated FEL scripts). see e.g. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-June/217476.html Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann bernhard.nortm...@web.de --- fel.c | 68

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH] Remove deprecated symbol from defconfig files

, but they somehow didn't make it upstream. The symbol is still present as of v4.1. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nortmann bernhard.nortm...@web.de --- arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 - arch/arm/configs/sunxi_defconfig| 1 - 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig

<    1   2