On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:23:50AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 06:36:05PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:36:33PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 01/02/2014 09:20 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > >On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:
Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2014, 10:23:50 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 06:36:05PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:36:33PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 01/02/2014 09:20 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > >On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:45:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 06:36:05PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:36:33PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 01/02/2014 09:20 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > >On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:45:29PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > >>>Also, instead of inventing yet ano
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:36:33PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/02/2014 09:20 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:45:29PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>>Also, instead of inventing yet another vendor-specific property, why not
> >>>re-use
> >>>a button binding s
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 12:38:31PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 09:20:22PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:45:29PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > >Also, instead of inventing yet another vendor-specific property, why not
> > > >re-use
> > > >
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 09:20:22PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:45:29PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > >Also, instead of inventing yet another vendor-specific property, why not
> > >re-use
> > >a button binding similar to gpio-keys like:
> > >
> > >lradc: lradc
Hi,
On 01/02/2014 09:20 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:45:29PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Also, instead of inventing yet another vendor-specific property, why not re-use
a button binding similar to gpio-keys like:
lradc: lradc@01c22800 {
compatible
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:45:29PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >Also, instead of inventing yet another vendor-specific property, why not
> >re-use
> >a button binding similar to gpio-keys like:
> >
> >lradc: lradc@01c22800 {
> >compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-lradc-keys";
>
Hi Hans, Dmitry,
Am Donnerstag, 2. Januar 2014, 10:37:47 schrieb Hans de Goede:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/01/2014 09:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 08:30:07PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> +Required properties:
> >> + - compatible: "allwinner,sun4i-lradc-keys
Hi,
On 01/02/2014 12:59 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi Hans, Dmitry,
Am Donnerstag, 2. Januar 2014, 10:37:47 schrieb Hans de Goede:
Hi,
On 01/01/2014 09:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 08:30:07PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
+Required properties:
+ - compatible:
Hi,
On 01/01/2014 09:56 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 08:30:07PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
+Required properties:
+ - compatible: "allwinner,sun4i-lradc-keys"
+ - reg: mmio address range of the chip
+ - interrupts: interrupt to which the chip is connected
+ - all
Hi Hans,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 08:30:07PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible: "allwinner,sun4i-lradc-keys"
> + - reg: mmio address range of the chip
> + - interrupts: interrupt to which the chip is connected
> + - allwinner,chan0-step: step in mV between keys mu
12 matches
Mail list logo