Hello,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:10:59AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 12:14:27AM +0100, Ondrej Jirman wrote:
> > The board has a vibrator mottor. Hook it to the input subsystem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <meg...@megous.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-tbs-a711.dts | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-tbs-a711.dts
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-tbs-a711.dts
> > index 2fd31a0a0b344..a22920275e99b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-tbs-a711.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t-tbs-a711.dts
> > @@ -99,6 +99,11 @@ panel_input: endpoint {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > + vibrator {
> > + compatible = "gpio-vibrator";
> > + vcc-supply = <®_ldo_io1>;
> > + };
> > +
>
> LDO IO1 can also be muxed in as a GPIO iirc, why did you choose the
> regulator instead?
According to the specification, LDO needs to be enabled (value 0b11)
to achieve the specified max driving current of 150mA:
https://megous.com/dl/tmp/92b7d9d94820c3ba.png
Otherwise the chip is probably just using the regular CMOS logic output
(typically limited to around 20-35mA, but not specified in this datasheet),
which would be probably overdriven, if we try to drive the motor with it.
And since we're driving a motor directly, the more the better.
thank you and regards,
o.
> Maxime
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20200224141437.opcsfhozfppulu4g%40core.my.home.
