On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:04:07AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:38:10 +0200
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> Hi Maxime,
>
> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 01:39:38AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:41:37 +0200
> > > Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > >
> > > > H
On 8/18/21 4:04 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:38:10 +0200
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> Hi Maxime,
>
>> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 01:39:38AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:41:37 +0200
>>> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 23, 202
Salut Alex,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:13:11AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 17/08/2021 09:38:10+0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > It's not entirely clear to me what those clocks are about though. If we
> > > > look at the clock output in the user manual, it looks like there's only
> > > >
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:38:10 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi Maxime,
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 01:39:38AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:41:37 +0200
> > Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:38:29PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
On 17/08/2021 09:38:10+0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > It's not entirely clear to me what those clocks are about though. If we
> > > look at the clock output in the user manual, it looks like there's only
> > > two clocks that are actually being output: the 32k "fanout" clock and
> > > the losc. W
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 01:39:38AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:41:37 +0200
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:38:29PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > > Add the obvious compatible name to the existing RTC binding.
> > > The actual R
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:41:37 +0200
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:38:29PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Add the obvious compatible name to the existing RTC binding.
> > The actual RTC part of the device uses a different day/month/year
> > storage scheme, so it's not
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:38:29PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Add the obvious compatible name to the existing RTC binding.
> The actual RTC part of the device uses a different day/month/year
> storage scheme, so it's not compatible with the previous devices.
> Also the clock part is quite
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 16:38:29 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Add the obvious compatible name to the existing RTC binding.
> The actual RTC part of the device uses a different day/month/year
> storage scheme, so it's not compatible with the previous devices.
> Also the clock part is quite different,
