[linux-sunxi] Re: Hardware Reliability Tests: How reliable are the tests mentioned on the wiki?

2015-11-06 Thread null
Gentoo is source based, rolling-release distro. You need permanently compile something to be updated ) As for cpuburn-a7 - it is a really stress test. For me it reliable, because in real world with real software(even in Gentoo), i can't stress A20 as cpuburn-a7 can. четверг, 5 ноября 2015

[linux-sunxi] Re: Hardware Reliability Tests: How reliable are the tests mentioned on the wiki?

2015-11-04 Thread Timo Sigurdsson
Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2015, 18:39 +0100 schrieb Timo Sigurdsson: > Hi, > > since I have an extra A20 board that doesn't have a specific purpose at the > moment, I thought I do some experiments with it and test performance and > reliability (among other things). > One of my tests involved

[linux-sunxi] Re: Hardware Reliability Tests: How reliable are the tests mentioned on the wiki?

2015-11-04 Thread Timo Sigurdsson
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2015, 11:07 -0800 schrieb null: > By my tests, A20 with small heatsink can run 1Ghz 24/7 at 1.275mv with > prolonged heavy load(emerge world, gentoo). > > > Without heatsink, it unstable even at 0.8Ghz. > > > my dmesg: > [cpu_freq] INF: voltage = 1625mv

[linux-sunxi] Re: Hardware Reliability Tests: How reliable are the tests mentioned on the wiki?

2015-11-04 Thread null
By my tests, A20 with small heatsink can run 1Ghz 24/7 at 1.275mv with prolonged heavy load(emerge world, gentoo). Without heatsink, it unstable even at 0.8Ghz. my dmesg: [cpu_freq] INF: voltage = 1625mvfrequency = 1296MHz [cpu_freq] INF: voltage = 1475mvfrequency = 1200MHz