[linux-sunxi] [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: beelink-gs1: Remove ext. 32 kHz osc reference

2021-03-30 Thread Jernej Skrabec
Although every Beelink GS1 seems to have external 32768 Hz oscillator, it works only on one from four tested. There are more reports of RTC issues elsewhere, like Armbian forum. One Beelink GS1 owner read RTC osc status register on Android which shipped with the box. Reported value indicated

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/2] sunxi: dts: H616: Drop reserved-memory node

2021-03-30 Thread Andre Przywara
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:58:23 +0530 Jagan Teki wrote: Hi Jagan, > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:31 PM Andre Przywara wrote: > > > > Trusted Firmware now adds the /reserved-memory subnode to the DT at > > runtime[1], putting in the right values. > > > > Drop our hard-coded version, as this might

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/2] sunxi: dts: H616: Drop reserved-memory node

2021-03-30 Thread Jagan Teki
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:21 PM Samuel Holland wrote: > > On 3/30/21 8:28 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:31 PM Andre Przywara > > wrote: > >> > >> Trusted Firmware now adds the /reserved-memory subnode to the DT at > >> runtime[1], putting in the right values. > >> > >>

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/2] sunxi: dts: H616: Drop reserved-memory node

2021-03-30 Thread Samuel Holland
On 3/30/21 8:28 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:31 PM Andre Przywara wrote: >> >> Trusted Firmware now adds the /reserved-memory subnode to the DT at >> runtime[1], putting in the right values. >> >> Drop our hard-coded version, as this might clash with the actual values >>

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: H616: Change TF-A load address to beginning of DRAM

2021-03-30 Thread Samuel Holland
On 3/30/21 8:01 AM, Andre Przywara wrote: > Loading Trusted-Firmware's BL31 at 16KB into DRAM was originally a hack > to allow sharing more code with the other SoCs (which use this offset > in SRAM). However there is no longer a reason for that, as the > problematic macros have been properly

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/2] sunxi: dts: H616: Drop reserved-memory node

2021-03-30 Thread Jagan Teki
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:31 PM Andre Przywara wrote: > > Trusted Firmware now adds the /reserved-memory subnode to the DT at > runtime[1], putting in the right values. > > Drop our hard-coded version, as this might clash with the actual values > (which have also changed), and rely on TF-A to add

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: H616: Change TF-A load address to beginning of DRAM

2021-03-30 Thread Andre Przywara
Loading Trusted-Firmware's BL31 at 16KB into DRAM was originally a hack to allow sharing more code with the other SoCs (which use this offset in SRAM). However there is no longer a reason for that, as the problematic macros have been properly separated there. The latest (and hopefully final) TF-A

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/2] sunxi: dts: H616: Drop reserved-memory node

2021-03-30 Thread Andre Przywara
Trusted Firmware now adds the /reserved-memory subnode to the DT at runtime[1], putting in the right values. Drop our hard-coded version, as this might clash with the actual values (which have also changed), and rely on TF-A to add the node. [1]

[linux-sunxi] [For v2021.04] [PATCH 0/2] sunxi: last-minute H616 fixes

2021-03-30 Thread Andre Przywara
The link address of the BL31 Trusted Firmware code has changed during the development, so we need to fix the load address in our FIT image template accordingly. The H616 TF-A patches are about to be merged now:

[linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64/h5: Add CPU idle states

2021-03-30 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Samuel, On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:44:50PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote: > On 3/22/21 8:56 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > >> I'm sending this patch as an RFC because it raises questions about how > >> we handle firmware versioning. How far back does (or should) our support > >> for old TF-A and