On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:11:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:06:39AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 04:56:01PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
With that said I think that Luc's approach is very sensible. I'm not
sure what purpose in the
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 20:13 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
In order for the gmac nic to work reliable on the Bananapi, we need to poke
these 2 undocumented bits in the gmac clk register. Since these are
undocumented, this commit only sets these bits on the Bananapi for now.
I'll contact
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:08 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Right, so lets just drop the board and I'll do a pull-req with only
the
bananapi gmac fix, can I have your Reviewed-by for that one please?
Done.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:59:59AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:57:18PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:54:00PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:34:36PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:44:57PM
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:21:11AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:28:14PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:47:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:46:43PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:18:08PM
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:39:02AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
You keep bringing up the Raspberry Pi for some reason and suggest that
it is somehow inferior to sunxi. What makes you think it's less entitled
to be supported on Linux than sunxi? I don't care about the Raspberry Pi
and I equally
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Quink wantl...@gmail.com wrote:
Such a big plan. I just did a small project with (Real-time patch for
linux kernel) + (processor affinity) + (super loop) on A20.
Since A20 has two A7, a real time process can occupy a processor and
leave the other for other tasks.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:52:58AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:21:11AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:28:14PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:47:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
What happened in the Snow
Hey list,
I'm trying to get uart5 to work on a setup here, and am having some
strange issues.
I tried this on stage-3.4 but couldn't get any output, so I quickly
switched over to mainline without going to deep into this.
I've configured uart0, uart2, uart5 and uart6 to do some tests. Using
On 30 September 2014 10:54, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:52:58AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:21:11AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:28:14PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:03:54AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:39:02AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
You keep bringing up the Raspberry Pi for some reason and suggest that
it is somehow inferior to sunxi. What makes you think it's less entitled
to be supported on
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:38:50AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 30 September 2014 10:54, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:52:58AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:21:11AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at
Hi,
On 09/30/2014 06:59 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:57:18PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
snip
But sure, you can still try to point new issues, get an obvious and
robust solution, and then discard the issue when the solution doesn't
go your way...
And you've
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 01:43:45PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09/30/2014 06:59 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:57:18PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
snip
But sure, you can still try to point new issues, get an obvious and
robust solution, and then discard
Hi,
On 09/29/2014 08:35 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:13:37AM +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
How did you come to the idea to poke these bits?
The linux 3.4 kernel from
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 09/29/2014 08:35 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:13:37AM +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
How did you come to the
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:54:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:52:58AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:21:11AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:28:14PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:47:15PM
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:02:50AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
2) Simplefb will only have a single user: the rpi. As the only other
users i can think of, which does not have a full driver and which does
not have clocks automatically disabled, are discrete cards. And they do
not really tend
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:02:50AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
2) Simplefb will only have a single user: the rpi. As the only other
users i can think of, which does not have a full driver and which does
not have clocks
Op 30 sep. 2014, om 14:02 heeft Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com het
volgende geschreven:
Hi,
On 09/29/2014 08:35 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:13:37AM +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
How
On 30 September 2014 13:31, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:38:50AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 30 September 2014 10:54, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:52:58AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Tue, Sep
Maybe a complete separate OS is a little easier than implement a modified
Linux Kernel as you did (impressive Job)
Maybe the Kernel is not the right word in my first post and a customized
boot will be a better definition. The system will have 2 simultaneous OS
kernels. For the Linux Kernel OS
Hi All,
I think we should start an errata page on the linux-sunxi wiki somewhere,
specifically targeting errata for the official user manual documents.
I know we already have various pages to document specific blocks, the
idea here would be to have a general errata page. The purpose is to have
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 06:21:18PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I think we should start an errata page on the linux-sunxi wiki somewhere,
specifically targeting errata for the official user manual documents.
I know we already have various pages to document specific blocks, the
idea
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
I think we should start an errata page on the linux-sunxi wiki somewhere,
specifically targeting errata for the official user manual documents.
Why not issue tracking on the github account Allwinner made?
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:09:24AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:55:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
So long as we're ensuring that when we don't start supporting resources
without DT additions or at least require DT additions to actively manage
them (which can then
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 08:03:14AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 05:11:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
Not really thought this through fully yet but would having phandles to
the relevant devices do the job? Kind of lines up with Grant's idea of
having dummy drivers.
Quoting Thierry Reding (2014-09-29 06:54:00)
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:34:36PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:44:57PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
Plus, speaking more specifically about the clocks, that won't prevent
your clock to be shut down as a side effect
Network commands are enabled by default in include/config_cmd_default.h
Undefining them in sunxi-common.h then causes multiple build warnings when
re-enabled
If there is good reason to disable by default then their should be a cleaner
way to enable the commands for those who want to use
This project is amazing. It will be very useful in industrial and
control area. I have two question: 1. Since you only need one or two
A7 cores to run RTOS, why not let the remaining A7 run Linux together
with A15 since this will use less power? 2. Are you going to build
only one image contain
30 matches
Mail list logo
