On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:39:21PM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The driver for the sunxi-ss crypto engine is not entirely 64-bit safe,
> compilation on arm64 spits some warnings.
> The proper fix was deemed to involved [1], so since 64-bit SoCs won't
> have this IP block we just disable this
Hi Andre,
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:39:29PM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The Allwinner A64 SoC is low-cost SoC with 4 ARM Cortex-A53 cores
> and the typical tablet / TV box peripherals.
> The Soc is based on the (32-bit) Allwinner H3 chip, sharing most of
> the peripherals and the memory map.
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:06:30 +0100
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The mtd_ooblayout_xxx() helper functions have been added to avoid direct
> accesses to the ecclayout field, and thus ease for future reworks.
> Use these helpers in all places where the oobfree[] and
On 5 February 2016 at 10:27, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:09:22PM +0100, codekip...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Marcus Cooper
>>
>> The sun4i, sun5i and sun7i SoC families have an SPDIF
>> block which is capable
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> sunxi_pmx_set accepts pin number and then calculates offset by
> subtracting pin_base from it. sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_get, on the other hand,
> gets offset so we have to convert it to pin number so we won't get
> negative value
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 01:06:07AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> > + compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-tcon-ch0-clk";
>> > + reg = <0x01c20118 0x4>;
>> > +
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
> Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
>
> > This patch adds support for APB0 in H3. It seems to be compatible with
> > earlier SOCs. apb0 gates controls R_ block peripherals (R_PIO,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:33:50AM +0100, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> sunxi_pmx_set accepts pin number and then calculates offset by
> subtracting pin_base from it. sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_get, on the other hand,
> gets offset so we have to convert it to pin number so we won't get
> negative value in
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:56:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> >On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
> >Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> >
> >>This patch adds support for APB0 in H3. It seems to be compatible
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 12:11:52PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> This patch adds support for APB0 in H3. It seems to be compatible with
>
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> It seems that on H3, just like on A10, when GPIOs are configured as
> external interrupt data registers does not contain their value. When
> value is read, GPIO function must be temporary switched to input for
> reads.
>
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> sun6i's AR100 clock is a classic factors clk case:
>>
>> AR100 = ((parent mux) >> p) / (m + 1)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 02:39:23PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
It seems that on H3, just like on A10, when GPIOs are configured as
external interrupt data registers does not contain their value. When
value is read, GPIO
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:09:22PM +0100, codekip...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Marcus Cooper
>
> The sun4i, sun5i and sun7i SoC families have an SPDIF
> block which is capable of playback and capture.
>
> This patch enables the playback of this block for
> the sun4i
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:06:28 +0100
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> In order to make the ecclayout definition completely dynamic we need to
> rework the way the OOB layout are defined and iterated.
>
> Create a few mtd_ooblayout_xxx() helpers to ease OOB bytes
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> Add the corresponding device node for R_PIO on H3 to the dtsi. Support
> for the controller was added in earlier commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Adamski
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 12
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:33:48AM +0100, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
> H3 has additional PIO controller similar to what we can find on A23.
> It's a 12 pin port, described in H3 Datasheet rev 1.1, pages 345-350.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Adamski
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard
Hi,
On 05/02/16 09:03, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:39:30PM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> The Pine64 is a cost-efficient development board based on the
>> Allwinner A64 SoC.
>> There are three models: the basic version with Fast Ethernet and
>> 512 MB of DRAM
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Krzysztof Adamski wrote:
>
>> It seems that on H3, just like on A10, when GPIOs are configured as
>> external interrupt data registers does not contain their value.
19 matches
Mail list logo