On 10/08/16 16:01, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
Hi,
> 09.08.2016, 19:58, "Andre Przywara" :
>> The MMC controllers in the Allwinner A64 SoC are somewhat compatible
>> with the versions used in other Allwinner SoCs.
>> Tell Linux about the three MMC clocks that the firmware
On 10/08/16 16:10, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>
>
> 09.08.2016, 19:57, "Andre Przywara" :
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is a proof-of-concept series to demonstrate the usage of firmware
>> driven clocks using the SCPI protocol for Allwinner SoCs.
>> This aims to replace the tricky and
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 12:53:00PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/arm-smc.txt| 53
> ++
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 06:21:47PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The Allwinner A64 SoC is a low-cost chip with 4 ARM Cortex-A53 cores
> and the typical tablet / TV box peripherals.
> The SoC is based on the (32-bit) Allwinner H3 chip, sharing most of
> the peripherals and the memory map.
>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:54:37AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Labbe,
>
> Since your ethernet driver is more or less ready for merging,
> I was wondering what the status of external phy support is ?
>
> I've a bunch of H3 boards (all orangepi-s) which use an external
> phy, if I take your
Hi Labbe,
Since your ethernet driver is more or less ready for merging,
I was wondering what the status of external phy support is ?
I've a bunch of H3 boards (all orangepi-s) which use an external
phy, if I take your v2 driver then what is needed on top to
get the ethernet to work on these ?
Hello
Just a minor comment below
> +static int smc_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = >dev;
> + struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + ret = of_property_count_elems_of_size(dev->of_node, "identifiers",
> +