Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3/4] sunxi: add stub EMAC device node in A83T device tree

2017-07-03 Thread Icenowy Zheng
于 2017年7月4日 GMT+08:00 上午4:46:17, Maxime Ripard 写到: >On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:54:17PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> >> >> 于 2017年7月3日 GMT+08:00 下午2:52:00, Maxime Ripard > 写到: >> >On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 03:02:43PM +0800,

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3/4] sunxi: add stub EMAC device node in A83T device tree

2017-07-03 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:54:17PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > 于 2017年7月3日 GMT+08:00 下午2:52:00, Maxime Ripard > 写到: > >On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 03:02:43PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> The Allwinner A83T SoC has an EMAC which is already supported by >

Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC PATCH 8/8] sunxi: enable PSCI for A83T SoC

2017-07-03 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 04:27:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > It definitely requires extra testing (booting the kernel hardly shakes > the GIC), but that's certainly encouraging. Can you run some > significant workload in a guest (kernel compilation, hackbench) and > report the results? Also,

[linux-sunxi] [PATCH v5] crypto: sun4i-ss: support the Security System PRNG

2017-07-03 Thread Corentin Labbe
The Security System has a PRNG, this patch adds support for it via crypto_rng. Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe --- Change since v4 - Fixed some spelling issue in Kconfig and patch description Changes since v3 (note: the v3 miss changes and version tag sorry) - Replaced

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v4] crypto: sun4i-ss: support the Security System PRNG

2017-07-03 Thread Corentin Labbe
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:36:43PM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Corentin Labbe > wrote: > > The Security System have a PRNG, this patch add support for it via > > crypto_rng. > > s,have,has, > s,add,adds, > > > > >

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] media: V3s: Add support for Allwinner CSI.

2017-07-03 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 06:59:52PM +0800, Yong wrote: > > > + select VIDEOBUF2_DMA_CONTIG > > > + select REGMAP_MMIO > > > + ---help--- > > > +Support for the Allwinner Camera Sensor Interface Controller. > > > > This controller is the same for all Allwinner SoC models? > > No. > I will

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] media: V3s: Add support for Allwinner CSI.

2017-07-03 Thread Yong
Hi Hans, Thanks for your review. On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:18:55 +0200 Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Yong Deng, > > Thanks for contributing this driver! > > First a high-level comment: you need to rebase this to the latest media_tree > master branch

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] media: V3s: Add support for Allwinner CSI.

2017-07-03 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Yong Deng, Thanks for contributing this driver! First a high-level comment: you need to rebase this to the latest media_tree master branch (https://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git/) since v4l2-of.h has been replaced by v4l2-fwnode.h. So this driver will not apply as-is. Also missing is a

Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC PATCH 8/8] sunxi: enable PSCI for A83T SoC

2017-07-03 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 04:40:20PM +0100, André Przywara wrote: > On 02/07/17 15:17, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:06:55PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >>> If that is so fundamentally broken that this is the only benefit, I > >>> guess we might as well use some old-style

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3/4] sunxi: add stub EMAC device node in A83T device tree

2017-07-03 Thread Icenowy Zheng
于 2017年7月3日 GMT+08:00 下午2:52:00, Maxime Ripard 写到: >On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 03:02:43PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> The Allwinner A83T SoC has an EMAC which is already supported by >> sun8i_emac driver in U-Boot now. >> >> Add a stub device node for it. >>

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 3/4] sunxi: add stub EMAC device node in A83T device tree

2017-07-03 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 03:02:43PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > The Allwinner A83T SoC has an EMAC which is already supported by > sun8i_emac driver in U-Boot now. > > Add a stub device node for it. > > The device node cannot work for Linux, because it now lacks the proper > clock definition;