[linux-sunxi] Re: FEL mode unstable - what could cause this?

2021-09-06 Thread Jurrie Overgoor
On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 9:50:56 PM UTC+2 Jurrie Overgoor wrote: > I am trying to use FEL mode with a F1C200s. Other people (owning the same > device) report everything works fine. But for me it is very unstable. > [Snip] > Reading online suggests failing hardware. I tried with three

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 30/52] dt-bindings: mmc: Convert MMC Card binding to a schema

2021-09-06 Thread Ulf Hansson
On Wed, 1 Sept 2021 at 11:19, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > MMC Cards can have an optional Device Tree binding to add > non-discoverable properties. > > Now that we have the DT validation in place, let's convert the device > tree bindings for that driver over to a YAML schema. > > Some of these

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 52/52] arm64: dts: allwinner: teres-i: Remove wakekup-source from the PMIC

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:24:48PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:52 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > Neither the binding nor the driver make any use of the wakeup-source > > property for the AXP803. Remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > >

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 51/52] arm64: dts: allwinner: teres-i: Add missing reg

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:14:34PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:51 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > The anx6345 bridge mandates that the input port is named port@0. Since > > we have a unit-address, this implies that we need a reg property with > > the

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 50/52] arm64: dts: allwinner: pinetab: Change regulator node name to avoid warning

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:14:08PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:50 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > The fixed regulator clock name has a unit address, but no reg property, > > which generates a warning in DTC. Change its name to remove its useless > >

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 49/52] arm64: dts: allwinner: a100: Fix thermal zone node name

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:13:46PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:49 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > The thermal zones one the A100 are called $device-thermal-zone. > > > > However, the thermal zone binding explicitly requires that zones are > > called

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 48/52] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Fix de3 parent clocks ordering

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:13:25PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:48 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > While it doesn't really matter from a functional point of view in this > > driver's case, it's usually a good practice to list the clocks in a > >

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 46/52] ARM: dts: cubieboard4: Remove the dumb-vga-dac compatible

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:12:27PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:46 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > The dumb-vga-dac and adi,adv7123 compatibles are not supposed to be used > > together according to the binding. > > > > Since the corpro gm7123 is a

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 45/52] ARM: dts: tbs711: Fix touchscreen compatible

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:11:58PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:45 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > The edt,edt-ft5x06 compatible has never been a valid compatible > > according to the binding. Let's change for one that is. > > > > Signed-off-by:

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 43/52] ARM: dts: sunxi: Fix the SPI NOR node names

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:06:45PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:43 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > According to the SPI NOR bindings, the flash node names are supposed to > > be flash@. Let's fix our users to use that new scheme. > > > >

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 42/52] ARM: dts: sunxi: Fix OPPs node name

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:05:58PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:42 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > The operating-points-v2 nodes are named inconsistently, but mostly > > either opp_table0 or gpu-opp-table. However, the underscore is an > > invalid

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 41/52] ARM: dts: sunxi: Fix OPP arrays

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:04:59PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:41 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > Even though it translates to the same thing down to the binary level, we > > should have an array of 2 number cells to describe each OPP, which in > >

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 40/52] ARM: dts: sunxi: Rename gpio pinctrl names

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:03:11PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:40 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > We've had a pinctrl node name convention for a while now, let's follow > > it for the AXP pinctrl nodes as well. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 39/52] ARM: dts: sunxi: Rename power-supply names

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:02:44PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:39 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > The name of our PMIC power supply names conflict with the generic > > regulator supply check that matches anything called *-supply, including > > the

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 35/52] dt-bindings: sunxi: Add Allwinner A80 PRCM Binding

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:01:17PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:35 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > Even though we've used the A80 PRCM driver for some time and a number of > > boards using it already, we never had a binding for it. Let's add it > >

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 34/52] dt-bindings: sunxi: Add CPU Configuration Controller Binding

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 11:00:25PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:34 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > Even though we've used the CPU configuration driver for some time and a > > number of boards using it already, we never had a binding for it. Let's > >

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 09/52] dt-bindings: clocks: Fix typo in the H6 compatible

2021-09-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 10:50:32PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote: > Dne sreda, 01. september 2021 ob 11:18:09 CEST je Maxime Ripard napisal(a): > > Even though both the driver and the device trees all use the > > allwinner,sun50i-h6-de3-clk, we documented the compatible as > >

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v2 29/52] dt-bindings: mfd: Convert X-Powers AXP binding to a schema

2021-09-06 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 03 Sep 2021, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:18:29 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > The X-Powers AXP PMICs are supported by Linux thanks to its device tree > > binding. > > > > Now that we have the DT validation in place, let's convert the device > > tree bindings for that