Re: [fedora-arm] [linux-sunxi] cpufreq scaling broken on cubietruck

2015-09-29 Thread Peter Robinson
>>> On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 12:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> This is likely a problem with your kernel config, make sure that you've the axp209 mfd and regulator drivers enabled and loaded. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, Hans. I really should have figured that out on my own! >>> >>> Do you think

Re: [fedora-arm] [linux-sunxi] cpufreq scaling broken on cubietruck

2015-09-30 Thread Peter Robinson
>> > This is already fixed by this patch: >> > >> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/com >> > mit/drivers/regulator/axp20x >> > -regulator.c?id=d4ea7d86457a8d0ea40ce77bdeda1fc966cc35ec >> >> I've pulled this patch into the F-23/4.2.x kernel, it'll be in the >> 4.2.2

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/3] Allwinner DE2 HDMI SimpleFB support

2017-09-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > This patchset is for Allwinner DE2 HDMI SimpleFB support. > > The framebuffer initialized by the Allwinner DE2 driver can be > passed by to the kernel as simplefb, and this can enable the > kernel to display graphics without

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 0/7] sunxi: sync H3, H5, A64 DTs from mainline Linux

2018-05-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Andre Przywara wrote: > This is an updated version of the series which brings the exact mainline > Linux device tree files for various Allwinner boards into U-Boot. > Apart from using the usually more correct reference DT files, this offers

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] dm: Add migration plan for CONFIG_BLK

2018-04-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:28 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Andre, > > On 2 April 2018 at 09:43, André Przywara wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 01/04/18 14:19, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:34:19PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] dm: Add migration plan for CONFIG_BLK

2018-04-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 2 April 2018 at 10:45, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:28 AM, Simon Glass <s...@google.com> wrote: >>> Hi Andre, >&g

[linux-sunxi] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] sunxi: Pine64: DTS: enable USB PHY 0 for HCI0

2019-05-16 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:47 AM Andre Przywara wrote: > > The first USB controller on the A64 SoC shares a PHY with the OTG > controller. Reportedly to avoid problems with the VBUS regulator under > Linux, we don't link OHCI0/EHCI0 to the USB PHY in the A64 .dtsi file. > > However on boards which

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/5] sunxi: enable automatic eMMC boot partition support

2020-11-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 1:14 PM Andre Przywara wrote: > > The eMMC standard describes the concept of boot partitions, consisting > of two storage areas separate from the main user data partition. > The Allwinner BootROM supports loading SPL/Boot0 from such a boot > partition, if that is configured

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH] sunxi: Properly check for SATAPWR and MACPWR

2021-01-19 Thread Peter Robinson
probably due to our standalone compiler switches. > > Reported-by: Peter Robinson > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara Tested-by: Peter Robinson Tested on Pine64, Cubietruck with root fs on SATA SSD, and an orangepi_pc > --- > board/sunxi/board.c | 34 ++---

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/2] sunxi: support asymmetric dual rank DRAM on A64/R40

2021-03-18 Thread Peter Robinson
; DRAM support necessary. > > Add this support. The code could support both A64 and R40, but because > dual rank detection is broken on R40 now, we cannot really use it on R40 > currently. > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng Tested-by: Peter Robinson Tested on Pinephone Bra

[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 20/20] Enable led on boot to notify user of boot status

2021-02-25 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 3:17 PM André Przywara wrote: > > On 20/02/2021 12:14, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > > From: Marius Gripsgard > > Hi, > > This is not really Pinephone specific, actually not even sunxi specific. > I see two better ways of solving this: > > - We introduce some generic code