Re: [PATCH] rtla: clarify trace option syntax in documentation and usage help

2025-07-25 Thread Tomas Glozar
čt 24. 7. 2025 v 15:59 odesílatel Steven Rostedt napsal: > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:52:33 -0400 > Ivan Pravdin wrote: > > Valid usage: > > - `-t[file]` > > - `-t=[file]` > > - `--trace=[file]` > > > > Invalid usage: > > - `-t [file]` > > - `--trace [file]` > > I wonder if the

Re: [PATCH] rtla: clarify trace option syntax in documentation and usage help

2025-07-24 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 21:52:33 -0400 Ivan Pravdin wrote: > When using `rtla timerlat {top,hist}`, the `-t/--trace` option is > optional. However, when providing a filename, the long option requires > an equal sign (`=`), i.e., `--trace=`. This is because the > command-line parser treats `--trace` w

[PATCH] rtla: clarify trace option syntax in documentation and usage help

2025-07-22 Thread Ivan Pravdin
When using `rtla timerlat {top,hist}`, the `-t/--trace` option is optional. However, when providing a filename, the long option requires an equal sign (`=`), i.e., `--trace=`. This is because the command-line parser treats `--trace` without `=` as a flag with no value, leading to unexpected behavio