On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:27:49 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:10:38 +0900
> "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
>
> > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
> >
> > Fix to initialize 'val' local variable with zero.
> > Dan reported that Smatch static code checker reports an error
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:10:38 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
>
> Fix to initialize 'val' local variable with zero.
> Dan reported that Smatch static code checker reports an error that a local
> 'val' variable needs to be initialized. Actually, the
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:10:38 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
>
> Fix to initialize 'val' local variable with zero.
> Dan reported that Smatch static code checker reports an error that a local
> 'val' variable needs to be initialized. Actually, the
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:44:23 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> > > kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> > > 846 return;
> > > 847
> > > 848 for (i = 0; i < earg->size; i++) {
> > > 849 struct fetch_insn *code = >code[i];
> > > 850
> >
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
Fix to initialize 'val' local variable with zero.
Dan reported that Smatch static code checker reports an error that a local
'val' variable needs to be initialized. Actually, the 'val' is expected to
be initialized by FETCH_OP_ARG in the same loop, but it is not
