Re: [PATCH net-next v9 0/7] Implement reset reason mechanism to detect

Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Paolo Abeni : On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:13:33 +0800 you wrote: > From: Jason Xing > > In production, there are so many cases about why the RST skb is sent but > we don't have a very convenient/fast method to detect the exact

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/2] tcp: make trace of reset logic complete

Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:36:03 +0800 you wrote: > From: Jason Xing > > Before this, we miss some cases where the TCP layer could send RST but > we cannot trace it. So I decided to complete it :) > > v4 > Link: >

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] trace: use TP_STORE_ADDRS macro

Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Paolo Abeni : On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:43:44 +0800 you wrote: > From: Jason Xing > > Using the macro for other tracepoints use to be more concise. > No functional change. > > Jason Xing (3): > trace: move to TP_STORE_ADDRS

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] tcp: add two missing addresses when using trace

Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Paolo Abeni : On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:29:32 +0800 you wrote: > From: Jason Xing > > When I reviewed other people's patch [1], I noticed that similar things > also happen in tcp_event_skb class and tcp_event_sk_skb class. They >