Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: add tracepoint block_rq_tag_wait

2026-03-19 Thread Aaron Tomlin
On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 05:52:49PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 21:53:00 -0400
> Aaron Tomlin  wrote:
> 
> > +   TP_fast_assign(
> > +   __entry->dev= disk_devt(q->disk);
> > +   __entry->hctx_id= hctx->queue_num;
> > +   __entry->is_sched_tag   = is_sched_tag;
> > +
> > +   if (__entry->is_sched_tag)
> 
> Nit, but why use __entry->is_sched_tag instead of is_sched_tag.
> 
> Not sure if the compiler will optimize it (likely it will), but it seems
> cleaner to use the variable directly and not the one assigned.
> 
> Perhaps the compiler is smart enough to use one register for both updates.
> 
Hi Steve,

Thank you for your feedback.

That was an oversight - I'll correct it now.


Kind regards,
-- 
Aaron Tomlin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: add tracepoint block_rq_tag_wait

2026-03-19 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 21:53:00 -0400
Aaron Tomlin  wrote:

> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->dev= disk_devt(q->disk);
> + __entry->hctx_id= hctx->queue_num;
> + __entry->is_sched_tag   = is_sched_tag;
> +
> + if (__entry->is_sched_tag)

Nit, but why use __entry->is_sched_tag instead of is_sched_tag.

Not sure if the compiler will optimize it (likely it will), but it seems
cleaner to use the variable directly and not the one assigned.

Perhaps the compiler is smart enough to use one register for both updates.

-- Steve


> + __entry->nr_tags = hctx->sched_tags->nr_tags;
> + else
> + __entry->nr_tags = hctx->tags->nr_tags;
> + ),
> +



Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: add tracepoint block_rq_tag_wait

2026-03-19 Thread Laurence Oberman
On Thu, 2026-03-19 at 07:32 +, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Looks good,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn 

Looks good now.

Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman 
Tested-by:   Laurence Oberman 




Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: add tracepoint block_rq_tag_wait

2026-03-19 Thread Johannes Thumshirn
Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn 



Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: add tracepoint block_rq_tag_wait

2026-03-18 Thread Damien Le Moal
On 3/19/26 10:53, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> In high-performance storage environments, particularly when utilising
> RAID controllers with shared tag sets (BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED), severe
> latency spikes can occur when fast devices (SSDs) are starved of hardware
> tags when sharing the same blk_mq_tag_set.
> 
> Currently, diagnosing this specific hardware queue contention is
> difficult. When a CPU thread exhausts the tag pool, blk_mq_get_tag()
> forces the current thread to block uninterruptible via io_schedule().
> While this can be inferred via sched:sched_switch or dynamically
> traced by attaching a kprobe to blk_mq_mark_tag_wait(), there is no
> dedicated, out-of-the-box observability for this event.
> 
> This patch introduces the block_rq_tag_wait static trace point in the
> tag allocation slow-path. It triggers immediately before the thread
> yields the CPU, exposing the exact hardware context (hctx) that is
> starved, the specific pool experiencing starvation (hardware or software
> scheduler), and the total pool depth.
> 
> This provides storage engineers and performance monitoring agents
> with a zero-configuration, low-overhead mechanism to definitively
> identify shared-tag bottlenecks and tune I/O schedulers or cgroup
> throttling accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin 
> ---
> Changes in v1 [1]:
>  - Improved the description of the trace point (Damien Le Moal)
>  - Removed the redundant "active requests" (Laurence Oberman)
>  - Introduced pool-specific starvation tracking
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> 
>  block/blk-mq-tag.c   |  4 
>  include/trace/events/block.h | 43 
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index 33946cdb5716..a6691a4fe7a7 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include 
>  
>  #include 
> +#include 
>  #include "blk.h"
>  #include "blk-mq.h"
>  #include "blk-mq-sched.h"
> @@ -187,6 +188,9 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data 
> *data)
>   if (tag != BLK_MQ_NO_TAG)
>   break;
>  
> + trace_block_rq_tag_wait(data->q, data->hctx,
> + !!(data->rq_flags & RQF_SCHED_TAGS));

I do not think that the "!!" is needed here.

Other than this, this looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal 

> +
>   bt_prev = bt;
>   io_schedule();
>  
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/block.h b/include/trace/events/block.h
> index 6aa79e2d799c..f7708d0d7a0c 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/block.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/block.h
> @@ -226,6 +226,49 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(block_rq,
> IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(__entry->ioprio), __entry->comm)
>  );
>  
> +/**
> + * block_rq_tag_wait - triggered when a request is starved of a tag
> + * @q: request queue of the target device
> + * @hctx: hardware context of the request experiencing starvation
> + * @is_sched_tag: indicates whether the starved pool is the software 
> scheduler
> + *
> + * Called immediately before the submitting context is forced to block due
> + * to the exhaustion of available tags (i.e., physical hardware driver tags
> + * or software scheduler tags). This trace point indicates that the context
> + * will be placed into an uninterruptible state via io_schedule() until an
> + * active request completes and relinquishes its assigned tag.
> + */
> +TRACE_EVENT(block_rq_tag_wait,
> +
> + TP_PROTO(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool 
> is_sched_tag),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(q, hctx, is_sched_tag),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field( dev_t, dev )
> + __field( u32,   hctx_id )
> + __field( u32,   nr_tags )
> + __field( bool,  is_sched_tag)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->dev= disk_devt(q->disk);
> + __entry->hctx_id= hctx->queue_num;
> + __entry->is_sched_tag   = is_sched_tag;
> +
> + if (__entry->is_sched_tag)
> + __entry->nr_tags = hctx->sched_tags->nr_tags;
> + else
> + __entry->nr_tags = hctx->tags->nr_tags;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("%d,%d hctx=%u starved on %s tags (depth=%u)",
> +   MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> +   __entry->hctx_id,
> +   __entry->is_sched_tag ? "scheduler" : "hardware",
> +   __entry->nr_tags)
> +);
> +
>  /**
>   * block_rq_insert - insert block operation request into queue
>   * @rq: block IO operation request


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research



Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: add tracepoint block_rq_tag_wait

2026-03-18 Thread Chaitanya Kulkarni
On 3/18/26 18:53, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> In high-performance storage environments, particularly when utilising
> RAID controllers with shared tag sets (BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED), severe
> latency spikes can occur when fast devices (SSDs) are starved of hardware
> tags when sharing the same blk_mq_tag_set.
>
> Currently, diagnosing this specific hardware queue contention is
> difficult. When a CPU thread exhausts the tag pool, blk_mq_get_tag()
> forces the current thread to block uninterruptible via io_schedule().
> While this can be inferred viasched:sched_switch or dynamically
> traced by attaching a kprobe to blk_mq_mark_tag_wait(), there is no
> dedicated, out-of-the-box observability for this event.
>
> This patch introduces the block_rq_tag_wait static trace point in the
> tag allocation slow-path. It triggers immediately before the thread
> yields the CPU, exposing the exact hardware context (hctx) that is
> starved, the specific pool experiencing starvation (hardware or software
> scheduler), and the total pool depth.
>
> This provides storage engineers and performance monitoring agents
> with a zero-configuration, low-overhead mechanism to definitively
> identify shared-tag bottlenecks and tune I/O schedulers or cgroup
> throttling accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin
> ---
> Changes in v1 [1]:
>   - Improved the description of the trace point (Damien Le Moal)
>   - Removed the redundant "active requests" (Laurence Oberman)
>   - Introduced pool-specific starvation tracking
>
> [1]:https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/


LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni 

-ck