Hi Oliver,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 15:13 +0200, dave penkler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just a few remarks.
thank you.
>
>>
>> +static int usbtmc488_ioctl_read_stb(struct usbtmc_device_data *data,
>> +
Hi dave,
[auto build test WARNING on usb/usb-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please
suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/dave-penkler/USB-usbtmc-Add-support-for-missing-USBTMC-USB488-spec/20151014-211711
reproduce:
#
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 15:13 +0200, dave penkler wrote:
Hi,
just a few remarks.
>
> +static int usbtmc488_ioctl_read_stb(struct usbtmc_device_data *data,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + u8 *buffer;
> + struct device *dev;
> + int rv;
> + u8 tag, stb;
Implement support for the USB488 defined READ_STATUS_BYTE and SRQ
notifications with ioctl, fasync and poll/select in order to be able
to synchronize with variable duration instrument operations.
Add ioctls for other USB488 requests: REN_CONTROL, GOTO_LOCAL and
LOCAL_LOCKOUT.
Add convenience