On 12/03/2016 07:47 PM, Felix Hädicke wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On 12/01/2016 10:44 PM, Felix Hädicke wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
Hi,
Good catch but I have a few comments to commit message:
On 12/01/2016 12:24 AM, Felix Hädicke wrote:
> This fixes a regression which was introduced
Hi,
> On 12/01/2016 10:44 PM, Felix Hädicke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Good catch but I have a few comments to commit message:
> >>
> >> On 12/01/2016 12:24 AM, Felix Hädicke wrote:
> >>> This fixes a regression which was introduced by commit f1bddbb, by
> >>> reverting a small
On 12/01/2016 10:44 PM, Felix Hädicke wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Good catch but I have a few comments to commit message:
>>
>> On 12/01/2016 12:24 AM, Felix Hädicke wrote:
>>> This fixes a regression which was introduced by commit f1bddbb, by
>>> reverting a small fragment of commit 855ed04.
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> Good catch but I have a few comments to commit message:
>
> On 12/01/2016 12:24 AM, Felix Hädicke wrote:
>> This fixes a regression which was introduced by commit f1bddbb, by
>> reverting a small fragment of commit 855ed04.
>>
> Not exactly. The regression has been introduced by
Hi,
Good catch but I have a few comments to commit message:
On 12/01/2016 12:24 AM, Felix Hädicke wrote:
> This fixes a regression which was introduced by commit f1bddbb, by
> reverting a small fragment of commit 855ed04.
>
Not exactly. The regression has been introduced by commit 855ed04
This fixes a regression which was introduced by commit f1bddbb, by
reverting a small fragment of commit 855ed04.
If the following conditions were met, usb_gadget_probe_driver() returned
0, although the call was unsuccessful:
1. A particular UDC was specified by thge gadget driver (using member
