Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: phy core cannot yet be a module

2013-04-23 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 07:07:59PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:54:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > A lot of platform code calls into the usb phy core at the moment, which > > does not work if it is built as a loadable module. This will hopefully > > change w

Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: phy core cannot yet be a module

2013-04-23 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 06:11:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 23 April 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > looks like this is the only way, indeed. Do you need on the merge window > > on can this wait until -rc1 ? I just sent a pull request to Greg with > > urgent fixes for the merge w

Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: phy core cannot yet be a module

2013-04-23 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 23 April 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: > looks like this is the only way, indeed. Do you need on the merge window > on can this wait until -rc1 ? I just sent a pull request to Greg with > urgent fixes for the merge window. > > Greg, if you want to take this one as a patch, go for it: > > A

Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: phy core cannot yet be a module

2013-04-23 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:54:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > A lot of platform code calls into the usb phy core at the moment, which > does not work if it is built as a loadable module. This will hopefully > change when those platforms are all converted to DT based probing, > but for now,

[PATCH] usb: phy: phy core cannot yet be a module

2013-04-23 Thread Arnd Bergmann
A lot of platform code calls into the usb phy core at the moment, which does not work if it is built as a loadable module. This will hopefully change when those platforms are all converted to DT based probing, but for now, the easiest solution is to change it from "tristate" to "bool". This solves