Hi,
On 04-09-17 13:19, Peter Rosin wrote:
Hi!
Some comments inline...
On 2017-09-01 23:48, Hans de Goede wrote:
On non DT platforms we cannot get the mux_chip by pnode. Other subsystems
(regulator, clock, pwm) have the same problem and solve this by allowing
platform / board-setup code to add
Hi,
On 02-09-17 21:13, sathya wrote:
Hi,
On 09/01/2017 02:48 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On non DT platforms we cannot get the mux_chip by pnode. Other subsystems
(regulator, clock, pwm) have the same problem and solve this by allowing
platform / board-setup code to add entries to a lookup table
Hi!
Some comments inline...
On 2017-09-01 23:48, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On non DT platforms we cannot get the mux_chip by pnode. Other subsystems
> (regulator, clock, pwm) have the same problem and solve this by allowing
> platform / board-setup code to add entries to a lookup table and then use
Hi,
On 09/01/2017 02:48 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On non DT platforms we cannot get the mux_chip by pnode. Other subsystems
(regulator, clock, pwm) have the same problem and solve this by allowing
platform / board-setup code to add entries to a lookup table and then use
this table to look things
On non DT platforms we cannot get the mux_chip by pnode. Other subsystems
(regulator, clock, pwm) have the same problem and solve this by allowing
platform / board-setup code to add entries to a lookup table and then use
this table to look things up.
This commit adds support for getting a mux cont